User talk:LowLevel73/Archives/2014/December

Reidun Twarock primary sources
Hello. I've added a popular-science-type source to the page I made on Reidun Twarock. Is that enough to sort out the primary sources problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamishtodd1 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Hamishtodd1, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your contribution! I think that you can safely remove the maintenance template about the primary sources but if you can find and add other notable secondary sources that support other statements made in the article, it would be better. Wikipedia welcomes articles that match these guidelines about academics. The more the article is compatible with these guidelines, the more it's improbable that other editors will question its presence in the encyclopedia. Thanks again for your edits, let me know if I can help in some way. Happy editing! ► LowLevel (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions by user Aroniel2
WHO are you? Who?? Why are you obssesed with destroying the page of the Traditional Catechism? Who do you work for????? What is your telephone number???
 * Hello Aroniel2. The page that you have created was deleted simply because it was one of the many articles that were not compatible with Wikipedia guidelines. That article will be kept in the encyclopedia only when its topic will become compatible with Wikipedia guidelines. My suggestion to you is to focus on the guidelines, not on who applies them. I also suggest you not to ask for private information about other editors, because this behavior could be perceived as intimidating by some of them. Regards. ► LowLevel (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

I want to know WHO are you so I can understand your ideological propagandistic motivations. Why are you so OBSSESED??? Who do you work for? Are you a liberal catholic activist??? ALSO: HOW DO I DO A $100 DONATION TO WIKIPEDIA?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aroniel2 (talk • contribs) 11:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello, Aroniel2! I am another editor who happened to see your comments here on LowLevel73's talk page, because I was here about another matter. First of all, calm down. SHOUTING will get you nowhere and weakens your argument. Second, please understand that we are volunteer Wikipedia editors trying to enforce Wikipedia's guidelines. We are not obsessed, we are not "working for" anyone, we usually do not have any particular feeling for or against the subjects of the articles we evaluate. We simply enforce Wikipedia guidelines, which you should read: for example notability, neutral point of view, and "assume good faith". Stop trying to personalize this, stop attacking LowLevel73 or other editors, and focus on how you can make your material meet Wikipedia guidelines - either as a standalone article or as an addition to an existing article. Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia and I hope you will stay here and learn how to contribute to Wikipedia constructively. As for how to donate to Wikipedia, there should be a "donate to Wikipedia" link at the left hand margin of this page. --MelanieN (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Move it!
This copy&paste was wrong. You should have moved User:Nepalese Junar to User:Nepalese Junar/sandbox and then placed a delete tag on User:Nepalese Junar. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello RHaworth, thanks for the explanation. I erroneously excluded a "move" because I didn't know that I could have moved the page without creating a redirect. Now everything is clear, thanks again! ► LowLevel (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)