User talk:LowLevel73/Archives/2014/October

Welcome!
Hello, LowLevel73, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  22:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * @Fiddel Faddle: Thanks for the welcome! LowLevel73(talk) 01:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice
Hello ! I want to let you know that the appropriate deletion tag for the article, Chandan Majumder you recently tag for deletion is  because the article actually have contents, only that there is no assertion of significance or importance. Thanks! Wikicology (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello! Thanks for the heads up. Actually, the creator of the article added the contents about 50 minutes after I requested the speedy deletion. Thanks for updating the deletion tag! LowLevel73(talk) 12:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivelt Yiddish Forum
Hi

I just created this page because another page in Wikipedia was directing to it, I have no interest to promote this forum, I don't even know ho are the administrators, I'm just here to help people with information they might have interest in, if you believe the article should be written more formal, you are welcome to edit it or insert a tag requesting other users to edit, I don't know why deletion is in place here. Vinkel (talk) 03:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi I see the page is deleted already, any explanation for trowing away my work? Vinkel (talk) 03:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Vinkel! I'm absolutely sure about your good faith and that you created the article simply to contribute to the project, your efforts are appreciated! Said that, the article was unfortunately compatible with the G11 criteria for speedy deletion, which is related to articles that (even unwillingly) promote a subject and that "need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic".


 * As a suggestion for the future, very short articles like these, that make quite strong claims like "Ivelt is very important for..." or "non of them meets the size of information found on Ivelt" without any reference that backs up them, are usually considered mainly promotional in their nature. While statements like these would not cause a more detailed article to be speedy deleted, very short articles with bold claims and no references are instead usually deleted.


 * The solution for the future is simple, though: just be sure that the article does not meet any of the Criteria for speedy deletion and, as always, the more bold is a claim, the more references it needs. Again, thanks for your efforts, I understand very well how it can be frustrating to see a contribution deleted. I hope that this clarification can help you. If you need any further information, feel free to ask me. Best regards! LowLevel73(talk) 04:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks LowLevel73 and I really appriciate your effort to explain to me why it was deleted, I will go ahead and try to rewrite the article in a way it should be encyclopedic. I hope it will help people this time. Vinkel (talk) 17:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Olamic Days
LowLevel73,

It is for philological reasons why I would want this article to produced/displayed. It is worthwhile because of it's meaning for evolution, intelligent design, and any religion with a creation mandate. Also what a great term for research such as into evolution or things which take long periods of time as infinity is not a good word to use.

With great peace, Logna. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logna (talk • contribs) 05:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Genie Networks
Hi LowLevel73, I didn't realize my page will be vote for deletion that quickly... Although most people don't recognize the company, but it's quite famous within the Network/ ISPs industry for only two companies in the world can provide them network traffic flow analysis and management- Arbor Networks and Genie Networks. As I saw Arbor Networks already has a page, I thought creating Genie Networks was just natural. what do you think I can improve with the contents to withdraw your nomination?

Best Regards, Nicole — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxeyes0514 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Foxeyes0514! If the subject is actually well known in their industry and if their importance can be backed up by independent, notable and reliable sources, then you should add references to the article. This is an article that could help you: Help:Referencing for beginners. You can contest the speedy deletion clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button and stating that you need a bit more time to provide the references and to make clear in the article why the company is notable. Also, if you are connected to the company in any way, then you should read what to do about the Conflict of interest. I hope that it helps. LowLevel73(talk) 08:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi LowLevel73,
 * Will do, thanks. Foxeyes0514 (talk) 10:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of butN Limited page
Hi LowLevel73 please instruct as how to modify article so as to not make it look promotional. I have been searching on startups / established companies which are competing LinkedIN's supremacy.Adsyvb (talk) 11:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Adsyvb
 * Hello Adsyvb! I've read your talk page and it seems that other editors have given to you very good suggestions to avoid any further issue with the article that you are writing. I will add my voice to those editors who suggested to you to seek help at Articles for creation. Writing an article for an encyclopedia is quite different than writing other kind of articles and I'm sure that the people at "Articles for creation" could help you a lot. Once you'll get a better vision of what Wikipedia can accept, I'm sure that you'll be able to improve the article and to make it compatible with the guidelines. Thanks for your contribution, if you have any other doubt about how to proceed, I'll be glad to answer to your questions. Happy editing! LowLevel73(talk) 01:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)