User talk:Loweeel

Yote!

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Criticism of the War on Terror for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticism of the War on Terror is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Criticism of the War on Terror until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtrainor (talk) 10:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Travis J I Corcoran
You appear to have made this page using an InfoBox maker. Infoboxes are meant to go on the side of a regular Wikipedia page, not be the entire content of the page. You also don't establish why he is notable. Since he is a living person there is a fairly high bar and so I will be nominating this for a speedy deletion (you will get a separate note about this). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

He's the author of a Prometheus-award nominated novel, as is evident from his page. But maybe give me more than 3 minutes to establish things before you start nominating things for a speedy deletion, ok, pal?

Speedy deletion nomination of Travis J I Corcoran
Hello Loweeel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Travis J I Corcoran for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I have removed this notice for now (seeing you are still working on it) but it might come back from another reviewer. You need to link to reliable sources that can establish he is a notable person. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Travis J I Corcoran


The article Travis J I Corcoran has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable author. Fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:AUTHOR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RA 0808 talkcontribs 20:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Powers of the Earth


The article The Powers of the Earth has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NBOOK."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RA 0808 talkcontribs 20:22, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Travis J I Corcoran for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Travis J I Corcoran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Travis J I Corcoran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RA 0808 talkcontribs 23:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Powers of the Earth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Powers of the Earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Powers of the Earth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RA 0808 talkcontribs 23:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Whatever a "favour" is (hint, nothing in a civilized country), there is nothing to come clean about. There was no sock-puppetry. There happen to be other people who feel similarly who didn't have wikipedia accounts. I don't engage in sock-puppetry, have never engaged in sock puppetry, and do not and have not made edits to Wikipedia outside of this account for over a decade. You, on the other hand, have made a baseless assumption, without evidence, that I would engage in crude and obvious sock-puppetry. Your assumption that I am those IP addresses, or am responsible for them or their posts in anyway, is unsupported by anything whatsoever. It is actual begging the question -- you are assuming what *you* need to prove; disproving your idiocy is not my job, as I am not responsible for your incorrect assumptions and conspiracy theories. Great burden-shifting, you megalomaniacal hack. As for your assertion that I "chose not to take that opportunity," I have better things to do than monitor messages on Wikipedia all day to avoid a Kafkaesque trial. If any opportunity was missed, it was yours to apologize for jumping to erroneous conclusions and making false assumptions. In closing, sod off, swampy. - Loweeel (talk) 13:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The Powers of the Earth
Hello, Loweeel,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Powers of the Earth should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/The Powers of the Earth.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 14:47, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Powers of the Earth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Powers of the Earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Powers of the Earth& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Powers of the Earth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Powers of the Earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Powers of the Earth& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)