User talk:Lp12311

Speedy deletion of "Cliff rees"
A page you created, Cliff rees, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. BigHairRef | Talk 23:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of MMM...COOKIES - Sweet Hamster Like Jewels from America!
A tag has been placed on MMM...COOKIES - Sweet Hamster Like Jewels from America! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 17:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jack O'Neill (author)
A tag has been placed on Jack O'Neill (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rtphokie (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Echelon: Somebody's Listening
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Echelon: Somebody's Listening, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. This is a self-published book, according to Amazon, from Word Association Publishers. I find 52 distinct google hits, but all I'm seeing are commercial sites. It looks like it could be a very good book, but I don't see any sign that it currently meets our inclusion guidelines.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have proposed Jack O'Neill (author) for deletion for the same reason. Please read over our inclusion guidelines for authors, at WP:AUTHOR. If there are reliable, published sources to verify that this individual meets those and that his book meets Notability (books), then please add those. Otherwise, it may be that he is not yet appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)