User talk:Lpd1571

Removal of PUIdisputed tag
Please do not remove PUIdisputed tags from images, as you did with Image:LPD 1885.jpg. If you wish to save this image from deletion, go and comment on its entry in Possibly unfree images. If you remove the tag again, you will be block for a longer period. Thank you. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

You need to provide sources for your images
In case you still do not realize this:

When uploading images to Wikipedia, please provide - in addition to a copyright tag - information on  where exactly the image came from. The copyright tag says nothing about where the image comes from; that is for you to write in the "Summary" section. Where the image came from is as important as its copyright status; it allows others to double-check that the copyright tag is correct.

Source information is different from copyright information. Tagging an image with a copyright tag (even if the tag is correct) tells us nothing about its source. Regards, Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, I have made the correct additions, does that satisfy Wikipedia standards. --'Signed' LPD1571 05:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, that information is now correct. Please remember to add source information to other images you have uploaded. Thanks! Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Geez, I did not know about keeping old messages, and as you can see I deleted that message that you put here about keeping them. There is so much to know about being a Wikipedian. Thanks again for your help, I hope I am not being too much trouble --'Signed' LPD1571 06:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:27Station.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:27Station.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 16:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Fremont Police Department (Nebraska)
A tag has been placed on Fremont Police Department (Nebraska) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 08:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:LPD1571.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LPD1571.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas K. Casady


The article Thomas K. Casady has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 21:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Joubert.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joubert.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roger P. Lempke


The article Roger P. Lempke has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Fails to meet biography guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 05:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Casady.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Casady.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

copyvio
Essentially the entire article Lincoln Police Department] is a copyvio of their web site. I don't really want to speedy delete a well-established article, but this must be rewritten entirely, or permission obtained., according to the formal procedure: You must explicitly license the rights to the material according to our licensing, using the CC-BY-SA  and the GNU  licenses, as explained in WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:Donating copyrighted materials ; be aware that these licenses  give everyone in the world an irrevocable license to reuse and alter the material, even for commercial purposes.    Even if permission is obtained, some of the style is unsuitable and will need some rewriting.  DGG ( talk ) 20:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LPD CenterTeamStation.jpg


The file File:LPD CenterTeamStation.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

File source problem with File:LPD HQ.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LPD HQ.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)