User talk:Lpow88

Reply to IRC question
Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. Please make sure that the subject is worthy of a Wikipedia article. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other, including the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which is difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical articles is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

All information about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. Article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.

All articles must be about subjects that are considered notable according to Wikipedia's standard of inclusion. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it. "Notable" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance," and even organizations that editors personally believe are "important" are only accepted as notable if they can be shown to have attracted notice. An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it.

Acceptable sources under this criterion include all types of reliable sources except works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as:

* sources that simply report meeting times, shopping hours or event schedules, * the publications of telephone numbers, addresses, and directions in business directories, * the season schedule or final score from sporting events, * routine communiqués announcing such matters as the hiring or departure of personnel, * brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business, * simple statements that a product line is being changed, * routine notices of facility openings or closings (e.g., closure for a holiday or the end of the regular season), * quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources, or   * passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization.

Lastly, all claims of notability must be sourced. Use neutral, reliable, third-party sources to establish the importance of the subject, except the following : except for the following:

* press releases, press kits, or similar works; * self-published materials; * any material written by the organization, its members, or sources closely associated with it; * advertising and marketing materials by, about, or on behalf of the organization; * corporate websites or other websites written, published, or controlled by the organization; * any material written or published by the organization, directly or indirectly; * other works in which the company, corporation, organization, or group talks about itself—whether published by the company, corporation, organization, or group itself, or re-printed by other people.

Here is how to use in-text citations:

--  Forty two  the answer? 18:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Telekenex concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Telekenex, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:41, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Telekenex


Hello Lpow88. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Telekenex.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)