User talk:Lrive133/sandbox

Week 2
Great job with your analysis of the Cazales page! I think you will be able to add a considerable amount to the article, which is good. Your answers on the content gap, on the other hand, were pretty mediocre. Please write much more for future assignments. You have to be thorough with your answers. Alfgarciamora (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
Your article shows a severe lack of information and from what I can see you've already more than doubled amount of information presented. The expanded lead section provides a nicer overview but as it is a lead section that should provide a summary you should include Cazalès relation to the monarchy in some sense since that seems to be a major topic to the article. It seems you can also separate the early life into another section, one about his education. So far you've done an astounding job with what you ere given, keep up the good work! Pnick ramirez2097 (talk) 04:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Pnick ramirez2097 thank you for the feedback. I'm glad someone recognizes the lack of information on the page. I like your idea to expand the lead section to include his relation to the monarchy and will make provisions to do so. I will also make a distinction between early life and education so as to be able to expand the two sections. If you have any more suggestions, I'd be open to your critique. I see you have quite a bit of information gathered on your character and would value your input. Lrive133 (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Week 8
A very nice job moving your stuff to the mainspace, ! Make sure that you shake out all your citations as much as possible so that you can get the details on your page with citations and all. Because you had very little information to begin with, you have the advantage that all you add will be useful and helpful - as long as it has citations. You can finish strong with this project for sure. Well done. Alfgarciamora (talk) 15:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)