User talk:Lschukin/sandbox

1/31/2018 Evaluation by Benjaminshokouhi
This article has a very long introduction and i would move second and third paragraphs to a history section below. Also, i have noticed that there is very little information in Architecture section. City with such a rich historical background should have more information about architecture. Another problem is that this article does not have proper citation. Overall it's informative and provides a lot of information about the city, but needs to be a little more organized. Lschukin (talk) 21:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC).

Spelling/Grammar[edit] Meets Expectations

Language: Meets Expectations

Organization: You did a great job in organization, but I believe you can do it even better by double checking end of each paragraph. and I think explanation is little bit too long.

Coding: Does not meet standards. Validity: This town is very complex and I believe gathering validation is not easy, you did a good job.

Completion: Meet standars.

Relevance: Meet standards based on your subject and very informative. Sources: Very good sources but placed wrong on the page.

Citations: Does not meet standards, and cited wrong.

References: Nearly meets standards for your subject.

Thank you for what you did, I love this city and looking forward to come back to your sandbox and read more about this marvelous town.

1/31/2018 Evaluation by User: Cattbrown86
I can't rate you on most of the categories because you haven't written your new information out in the format you are going to add to Wiki yet. You've found great sources, and the page will be much more accurate when you are done. You just still need to write, code and cite your sentences; let me know if you want more feedback when you get there. :)

Spelling/Grammar
Not Available

Language
Not Available

Organization
Not Available

Coding
Not Available

Validity
Meets Standard.

Completion
Does not meet standard

Relevance
Meets Standard.