User talk:Lscottewart

Welcome!

 * }

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Daniel Bongino has been reverted. Your edit here to Daniel Bongino was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/bonginoforsenate) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Bongino redirect
I have once again redirected Daniel Bongino to United States Senate election in Maryland, 2012, as per the deletion discussion. I understand that you have a somewhat proprietary interest in this article (of which you were the primary author, and to which your only contributions have been directed), but Mr. Bongino does not meet our notability guidelines (see WP:POLITICIAN for the requirements for political figures, and the general notability guideline for any person. WP:POLITICIAN explicitly states: Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this guideline, the general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion. Please respect our consensus-driven processes, or you will find yourself unable to edit, as you will be blocked for disruption.  Horologium  (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I do not believe the Daniel Bongino page should be redirected as you have indicated. I believe that the fact that the other candidates in the race have not been touched by you or anyone else (even me) is not consistant. Can you explain further? - lscottewart — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lscottewart (talk • contribs) 20:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Ben Cardin is an incumbent senator, who is unquestionably notable. S. Rob Sobhani has just been redirected (by me) to the same location, although I will not fight to keep it as a redirect; he is close to the line for meeting our notability requirements under the general notability guideline (by virtue of his appearances in various media). Mr. Bongino does not have the equivalent notability; in the discussion in which you participated, the consensus was to redirect the article, as per WP:POLITICIAN. (Although I did not participate in the discussion, I obviously endorse the result.) As for what articles I have and have not edited, that is not really relevant to my enforcement of the results of a properly closed AFD discussion. If you disagree with the result of the discussion, you are welcome to discuss restoration of the article at Deletion Review, but be aware that you first need to discuss it with User:Mark Arsten, who was the administrator who closed the original discussion.  Horologium  (talk) 20:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Daniel Bongino. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.  Horologium  (talk) 16:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.