User talk:Lssilva

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:


 * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try How to edit a page.
 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use 	 ~  (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes).
 * You can experiment in the test area.
 * You can get help at the Help Desk
 * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Five pillars, Neutral point of view, Civility, What Wikipedia is not, How to write a great article

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at New user log.

-- utcursch | talk

Proposed deletion of Alternative theory of the European discovery of Brazil


The article Alternative theory of the European discovery of Brazil has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a reasonable search term.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ScienceApologist (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Alternative theory of the European discovery of Brazil listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alternative theory of the European discovery of Brazil. Since you had some involvement with the Alternative theory of the European discovery of Brazil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ScienceApologist (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)