User talk:Lstaji

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Iatrogenesis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Iatrogenesis was changed by Lstaji (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-10-24T18:31:39+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Medical harm
Hello. I see you created the article Medical harm even though you are aware that an article on the same subject, Iatrogenesis, already exists. Wikipedia guidelines warn against having multiple articles covering the same topic. Would you mind merging any information from your article, provided it meets Wikipedia's guidelines, and then changing the Medical harm article into a redirect by replacing its contents with


 * 1) redirect Iatrogenesis

Let me know if you have any questions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I did see that page on iatrogenesis and did not feel it adequately addresses the issue of medical harm as a systemic problem - but also did not feel comfortable taking his page away since iatrogenesis is a legitimate term. But, thanks to you I realized that I did not convey that clearly in my lead.   Please check it and let me know what you think. - Laila


 * Thanks, that change makes all the difference. I made a further change, explained by my edit summary, but if I am misunderstanding something about what types of incidents iatrogenic illness covers, please feel free to undo my change. Also, I wonder if the meaning changes depending on whether you refer to it as "iatrogenic illness" or "iatrogenesis". Are those exactly the same thing, or is it just that the former has been redirected to the latter because the former doesn't have its own article? —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:24, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Medical harm for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medical harm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Medical harm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SW3 5DL (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)