User talk:LtJimmyDangle

this is my discussion page obviously.

Response.
In response to your E-mail, no I will not help edit the page. It appears to have been deleted, and had it not already been deleted, I would have nominated it for deletion myself. From what you sent, the article appeared to be an attack against Wikipedia, the administrators, and me. It would most likely been nominated using the tag. Acalamari 23:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You must not have read the entire email. I asked you to help make it NOT an attack on wikipedia or yourself, becuase actually the article has some truth and fact to it, and I now believe more of it because of your response to my email. I guess wikipedia is in fact spiraling downward out of control, and not just because of the people vandalizing it.--LtJimmyDangle 06:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The article has been deleted anyway; plus, there already is an article here about the criticisms of Wikipedia. I'm not going to help create a page that says what's already in another article. I did read the E-mail; and the majority of admins are not my age, and most of them are not power-hungry. I am sorry if I've upset you or anything, but I'm not going to help a deleted page that says what's in another page. Acalamari 17:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Im not upset, and I didnt know there was another page. I was just annoyed because i tried to fix it as much as possible but it still got deleted. And I didnt say most were power hungry.. i did not write that article, i just feel that new articles shouldnt be deleted because they aren't flawless when first written. but there is another article soo ill check that one out.