User talk:Lteran18/Dipylon Krater

This article appears to be full of unbiased, neutral information that appropriately covers the content of the Dipylon Krater. The description is thorough, and it provides thorough context as to what everything is- what makes it a Dipylon Krater rather than a normal krater, what an ekphora or a prothesis is, etc. The context is helpful and it doesn't lean towards any biases. The sources also seem to be reliable and neutral.

However, I felt like the lead section was a little confusing. I think maybe adding a section describing what the Dipylon Kraters were used for and how they're different from normal Kraters rather than putting that in the lead would be helpful. I also think that the coverage is very heavy on the description and doesn't really provide information for anything else. Maybe a historical context section or one on the discovery of the Dipylon Kraters would help to contextualize the differences between these Kraters and the "regular" ones.

Magzy2001 (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)