User talk:Ltuck3

Hello, Ltuck3, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place " " on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Citations added
[]

I added #28 (^ The Leader Post (Regina). "D-man cool as ice". © (c) CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc.. Retrieved June 28, 2011.) Niedermayer, however is still in a class of his own, as he has also won the 1992 Memorial Cup and the World Cup.[28]

[]

I added #16 ^ Fendrich, Howard. "Roger Federer seeks record 7th-tying championship as Wimbledon resumes Monday". Retrieved June 28, 2011. Following with tradition, Middle Sunday will be a day of rest, with no matches scheduled to be played. Play will resume on the next day.[16]

Wiki Edits
To the Deal or No Deal (UK game show) page, I found a misspelled word, so I edited that. Originally it said: "The player then takes their box and walks to the centre of the set." I edited it to say center rather than centre. Deal or No Deal (UK game show)

To the United States Space Camp page, I edited one of the many spots that appeared to be slightly biased- parts of this article is written as somewhat of an advertisement. I took out:strong from: "The curriculum is designed to balance a strong emphasis on education with a spirit of fun." I took out strong because it makes the reader not have a chance to think a different program could be as strong or better than this program. After taking out strong, I added an instead of a for proper grammar. United States Space Camp

To the Television Director page, I edited a section that used informal language and assumed the reader knew what "it" means. It first read: "Aside rattling off rapid-fire commands, it is also the live director's job to be cool under pressure and maintain order among the staff in the control room, on the set, and elsewhere. The director's commands must be artistic, accurate, and calm.  There is usually no room for error." After editing: "Other than quickly calling out commands, the television director is also expected to remain calm under pressure and maintain order among the staff in the control room, on the set, and elsewhere. The director's commands must be artistic, accurate, and calm. There is usually no room for error." This is a more formal tone and is also a little easier to read. Television director

To the United Kingdom-United States relations page, I edited the number of quotations in the article. There are only a certain number of quotations allowed in an encyclopedia page and this had exceeded it. The article initially had ten quotes. I edited down to three. (keeping only important quotes in the history of both nations. United Kingdom-United States relations

Articles for Deletion
I added to the AfD discussion of St. Bridget's Catholic Church. I agreed that the article should be deleted due to lack of a significant reason why it should be an article. The article was short and had no reason as to why it should have it's own Wikipedia page. I wrote: "Delete Although this is a well known Catholic Church, it has no significant reason to be a Wikipedia article. The article in itself has not enough information on the church. There is no reason St. Bridget's Catholic Church should be an article with no real significant historical purpose.--Ltuck3 (talk) 21:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC)"

I added to the AfD discussion of 2011 royal tour of Canada. I disagreed that the article should be deleted. It is significant to many peoples standards of a worthy Wikipedia article and is notable for Wikipedia. I think it is a perfectly good article and there will be more information for the article soon as the tour is currently going on. I wrote: "Keep the article may not be significant to some people's standards, but the article is certainly creditable. It has many sources and is notable as a Wikipedia article. It has a plethora of media coverage and is a well done article.--Ltuck3 (talk) 22:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)"

I added to the AfD discussion of George T. Lee. I agreed that the article should be deleted due to its lack of notability and importance. I tried to find other articles on George T. Lee, but he appeared to be unknown by both Google Scholar and Google News, as well as the Georgia Tech Library Database. I wrote:"   Delete It is obvious that George T. Lee is not significant and not worthy of being an article. He does not meet the standards of Wikipedia, but if he ever does somehow reach standards of Wikipedia then this article can be recreated. This article does not meet the necessary criteria for an article on Wikipedia, for now.--Ltuck3 (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)"