User talk:LuK3/Archive 6

ACC access
Hello Luke, I have unsuspended your account and welcome back, please subscribe to the ACC mailing list here, and IRC channel access will be set as soon as I can find someone to do it :P. Again welcome back P. S. Please review the guide as alot has changed. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 17:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

I've re-added the account creator right to your account. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi!
Hi sorry I didnt know that was unreferenced since I was given the task by one of the people involed. I was hust paid to edit that. Sorry! Indiedesole (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * A few things. Number one, please read Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, especially the policy on verifiability. You have to cite any additions to articles, especially of living people. In addition, you stated you were given the task of editing the article. You may want to read Wikipedia's policy about conflicts of interests. In addition, I'm not saying you are, however if you are paid for your contributions, you must disclose who is paying you. If you have any questions, feel free to reply back. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

About a page deletion
Hello LuK3,

I receive you massage right now and you ask me that not to remove Articles for deletion notice from a page but the problem is now I want to stop the discussion what I proposed as it take too long to delete the page so I want to apply speed deletion for the page.Now the problem I don't find any way to delete this page.Can you help me please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thikthik15 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I have closed your AfD nomination. Only administrators can delete articles. I highly recommend reading Wikipedia's deletion policy if you want to see if an article should be deleted. --   LuK3      (Talk)   13:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

What exactly is your problem in people creating their personal Wikipedia page.... Don't you want them to have their page?? Why hating? Oke adesuyi (talk) 16:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your article subject, in this case yourself (which is strongly discouraged), does not state a credible claim of significance. I highly recommend reading Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and specific guidelines on biographies. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:06, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

ACC
Hello Luke, can you fill me in on why acc:176483 is on hold? ~ riley  ( talk  ) 23:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Riley, it looks like I was going to work on that request later, but unfortunately didn't have time. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * In the future please break reservation, this would have saved a five day delay in response which is unacceptable. ~ riley  ( talk  ) 01:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Jim Miklaszewski
Source conflict? Does not adhere? http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/jim-miklaszewski-retiring-from-nbc-news/291405

AdWeek is a reputable industry publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wxjunkie0 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the note. I read over that article and it seems to be a reliable source to be included in the BLP article. If you need any help with adding the information, feel free to message me back! --   LuK3      (Talk)   14:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not retyping everything you deleted. Thanks for wasting my time. Wxjunkie0 (talk) 14:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)wxjunkie
 * here is the diff to the edit you made, if you want to re-edit the article. --   LuK3      (Talk)   14:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Faiz Syed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faiz Syed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faiz Syed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. for (talk)  14:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

American Solidarity Party
I see that you have supported deletion of the entry for the American Solidarity Party. The party has only become really active in the last couple of months - but membership has grown and there are now chapters in a number of states, a central committee was formed in early July, and folks are working to get on as many ballots as possible for this fall.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CBGJpQYqOThtl1WBxXoeBv3LH_HDv1nLSVZiQjvEwLY/edit#gid=0

In addition, the party has now gotten mention in First Things - http://www.firstthings.com/tag/american-solidarity-party.

Please reconsider your vote to delete for now as the Party is seeking to grow.

Thank you.

Lee Strong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.101.178.225 (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Luke
I was on Ernest simons page and I was writing about his current occupation and you changed it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.56.84.177 (talk) 00:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you NasssaNser, much appreciated! --   LuK3      (Talk)   23:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Unblock
Hi LuK3,

I'm trying to edit my supervisor's, Dr. Ellen J Kennedy's,Wikipedia page and was blocked. I'm confused as to how to unblock it. All I would like to do is put in her vita.

Ellen J Kennedy (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello, it doesn't seem like you were blocked. I did, however, revert your edits on the Ellen J. Kennedy. I reverted it for a few reasons. Editors are strongly discouraged to edit articles in which there is a Conflicts of interest. In your case, you are editing the article because she is your supervisor. In addition, contributions on Wikipedia must adhere to the policies on adhering to a neutral point of view and verifiability. If you have any other questions, feel free to reply! --   LuK3      (Talk)   14:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Changed language to be more editorial
Hi, You flagged my wiki page creation and I heavily edited it to reflect acceptable WIKI guidelines. Please confirm that my updated page is acceptable. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcorcor (talk • contribs) 23:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Elcorcor, unfortunately the page was deleted because it didn't conform to some Wikipedia policies. However, I created User:Elcorcor/Highland Technology so you can work on the article without having it deleted. I'm going to try and get the deleting administrator to get the information from the deleted article onto that draft. If you have any other questions, feel free to reply back. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

politics
Содержит анти правительственную пропоганду. На английском языке преподносится информация, как афера исключително Путина и Януковича, хотя это не так. Даная афера характерна для многих стран и не только указанных президентов. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carousel_voting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.252.151.129 (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Chris Koster
He is a corrupt career politician though? Takes 3.2 million of missouri taxpayer money to redecorate his damn office? And got a big write-up in the New York Times for his corruption? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.210.160 (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

You have removed valid content
You have removed my valid additions several times against Wikipedia's rules. If you do not stop I will have your editing privileges banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:83E8:CE20:B582:2083:5BB4:290E (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

If you believe something needs a citation add "citation needed." you ate not allowed to remove content simply because a citation is not provided. Right now it appears you are removing relevant information which follows Wikipedia's guidelines because you disagree with it politically.
 * Please read WP:UNSOURCED in addition to WP:NPOV. The policy allows me to remove any information that is not directly supported by an inline source. --   LuK3      (Talk)   23:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Daniel (Dano) Cerny
First, I have no conflict of interest per my interest in Mr. Daniel (Dano) Cerny. I am a colleague, but I am not being compensated for my interest in any way. I just want to see that your Wiki information is accurate.

The problem is that there are two pages regarding Mr. Cerny and his work.

The original page, entitled Daniel Cerny, is not well-referenced and it is very out of date:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Cerny

The second page, entitled Dano Cerny, is well-referenced, reasonably accurate and most importantly, up-to-date:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dano_Cerny

Can the second page be deleted, or at the very least appended to the first Dano Cerny page?

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Ptc81 (talk) 00:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello. According to your edit summaries, it looks like you have some sort of connection to the subject, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, biographies of living people are held to a high standard of verifiability, among other things. In addition, the second page is going through a deletion discussion, they will decide on the fate of the article there. If you have any other questions, feel free to reply. --   LuK3      (Talk)   01:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Are you able to clarify why the second 'Dano Cerny' article may be deleted? What is the potential problem? Thank you again. Ptc81 (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * According to the discussion, Articles for deletion/Dano Cerny, it looks like editors are concerned about the notability of the subject. --   LuK3      (Talk)   19:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Designer Genes
I do hope you're an admin. I've been reverting several more infarctions by Deigner Genes as you can see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Designer_genes

After his last warning as well. Forgive me for not knowing better how to respond but to revert. 66.191.15.94 (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice. I just saw that they have been reported over at AIV. Thanks for letting me know. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I changed the description for a reason.
It is proven fact that Adam Kokesh was only a civil officer in the USMC. Whom ever created this page (probably him) made his service in the USMC bigger than it truly is. What else do you need to know?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:3CE7:7200:396D:226C:15A8:8C20 (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The information is sourced and you simply cannot remove information. Please go to the article talk page to discuss your changes. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Want to help test advanced new tools planned for Recent Changes?
Hi LuK3! I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re an active Twinkle new user welcomer. The WMF Collaboration team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new technology—we’d like to hear from you.

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org with the subject line Twinkle Welcomer. Include the following information:


 * Username


 * Email where we can reach you


 * Your city or time zone


 * Best time to talk to you


 * Your primary use(s) of Twinkle or Recent Changes (e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.)

Thanks! Dchen (WMF) (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Warning!
You have reverted articles such as talk page of x86 and userpage of Jeh for more than 3 times! If you continue doing that, you would be blocked from editing on Wikipedia.org! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Counterjeh (talk • contribs) 01:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Read WP:3RRNO. --   LuK3      (Talk)   01:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

You deleted my things and it messed up my stuff 😭 Gamebøy6567YT (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:UPNOT about what shouldn't be on your userpage. Promotional content is not allowed in the userspace or in the mainspace. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
$1.00 XD

Cad315 (talk) 02:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC) 

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Legend of Warsaw
This wasn't an WP:CSD, because that requires a "plain indication" that the subject was "invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally". Just being apparently made-up isn't enough. In fact, this legend wasn't made up, at least not recently - it is described at Warsaw, and I have redirected the page to that, and told the author why. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks John. I did retroactively see Mermaid of Warsaw and should not tagged the article, rather a redirect. --   LuK3      (Talk)   18:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted
Hello LuK3. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as mark pages as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — xaosflux  Talk 03:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
 * Thanks Xaosflux, I appreciate it. --   LuK3      (Talk)   03:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Coca-Cola Zero Sugar
Hello, is there any source that says that Coca-Cola Zero is just getting renamed? It appear that right now it's only Europe and it looks like it's also been reformulated. Let me know. Thanks TheUSConservative (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I see an article from The Independent in the UK and Business Insider. It looks like it a reformulation of the Coca-Cola Zero however I'm not too sure it is replacing the old soda. --   LuK3      (Talk)   02:57, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

So then I feel like a new article is warranted for the time being. Do you agree? If so could you help expand it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUSConservative (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I would like to wait a little bit until there are some more reliable sources reporting on it. I'd be willing to help you on expanding it, just drop me a line. Thanks! --   LuK3      (Talk)   03:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

If you could help me find a logo or something with the logo on it. Maybe also with new information as well. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUSConservative (talk • contribs) 03:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Meatsgains. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Wild tic-tac-toe, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Meatsgains (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

Thank You
For catching and promptly tagging the G10 attack page. The vigilance of editors like you helps keep the project running smoothly. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ad Orientem, I appreciate the kind words. Congratulations on your new bit and best of luck in the upcoming year! --   LuK3      (Talk)   04:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Abdulhadi al Khawaja
The claim he is a "human rights defender" is as verifiable as the claim that he is a terrorist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.24.130 (talk) 18:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, LuK3!


Happy New Year! LuK3, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Donner60 (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thank you, best of wishes for the new year to you as well! --   LuK3      (Talk)   04:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * Not a problem! --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy birthday!
Warm regards, Mz7 (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much :). --   LuK3      (Talk)   06:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't know. I've made the articles just because someone asked me if can have a information about that in macedonian language so I didn't know how. Sorry again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hgfvghdy (talk • contribs) 18:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries, did you happen to check out the Macedonian Wikipedia? They may have better resources or articles to edit for you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   18:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Do we want to put in a AIV for Andrew0813?
He hasn't done any more vandalism after the final warning I gave him, but I'm pretty sure its a vandalism-only account. Also looking at his contribs, I see that he takes his time in editing, so he may be back in an hour or two to do more destructive harm to Civil War articles. Was wondering what your thoughts on the subject were. Thanks. L3X1 (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think reporting them to AIV would be the best course of action. There has been no constructive edits from the user. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, will do. L3X1 (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

The cliche is dead. Long live the cliche!
You're not an admin? This poll from a while back suggests you'd do really well, so the question is - do you still want to run the gauntlet, and when? -- Samtar talk &middot; contribs 21:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I still want to run however due to this being my last semester at school and work I don't think I'll be as active. Perhaps see me over at WP:RFA in a few months :). --   LuK3      (Talk)   22:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah understandable! Well I look forward to seeing you there :) -- Samtar talk &middot; contribs 08:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you very much. Thank you for your anti-vandalism fighting as well. --   LuK3      (Talk)   02:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

😤
I already edited it Gamebøy6567YT (talk) 00:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

Dreaded 45 day list @ ACC
Hello, just here to remind you to login to the ACC interface, you're on the dreaded 45 day list. Thanx, -  Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 16:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've been busy IRL but I'll try to get back into the groove of things. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

RFA time
I think it's time for another RFA after RFAP opinion polls suggest you have a high chance of passing lately.

KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 11:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your offer, however I would like to wait a little bit longer. I have not been as active as I should be. I want to get more active once the summer hits so we'll wait until then. Thank you again. --   LuK3      (Talk)   22:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the RfA per WP:CSD so a fresh one can be started up nearer the time. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm just going back through my list of possible RfA candidates and remember this discussion - are you still interested? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

About becoming an administrator
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:


 * Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

The same thing
It would probably be easier to use WP:SOCIALMEDIA when it comes to use of social media as a reference. Rather than an explanatory supplement, as so. Just a tip. :) Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 00:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've always used the WP:FACEBOOK and alike for social media and reliable sources. However I will use your suggestion in future edit summaries about social media references. Thanks! :) --   LuK3      (Talk)   01:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
Just saying thanks for earlier. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 02:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, we all encounter those vandals from time to time :). --   LuK3      (Talk)   02:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * lol, year and a half for this one. Never gives up. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 02:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Cumulus Media
Hi LuK3,

We wanted to correct the narrative for Cumulus Media. Here is the correct data on the company:

A leader in the radio broadcasting industry, Cumulus Media (NASDAQ:CMLS) combines high-quality local programming with iconic, nationally syndicated media, sports and entertainment brands to deliver premium content choices to the 245 million people reached each week through its 447 owned-and-operated stations broadcasting in 90 US media markets (including eight of the top 10), more than 8,200 broadcast radio stations affiliated with its Westwood One network and numerous digital channels. Together, the Cumulus/Westwood One platforms make Cumulus Media one of the few media companies that can provide advertisers with national reach and local impact. Cumulus/Westwood One is the exclusive radio broadcast partner to some of the largest brands in sports, entertainment, news, and talk, including the NFL, the NCAA, the Masters, the Olympics, the GRAMMYs, the Academy of Country Music Awards, the American Music Awards, the Billboard Music Awards, Westwood One News, and more. Additionally, it is the nation's leading provider of country music and lifestyle content through its NASH brand, which serves country fans nationwide through radio programming, exclusive digital content, and live events.

How do I get that corrected? Lori LewisLorilewis1234567 (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * First off, it looks like you have a personal connection to Cumulus Media which violates Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. The content you posted looks quite promotional in nature, which is also against Wikipedia's guidelines. You need to add material that is from a neutral point of view which is verified with reliable sources. --   LuK3      (Talk)   18:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Erroneous and slanted information on the CranioSacral Therapy Page
In reading other Talks about this page, it appears that people who have been trying to update and correct misinformation on this page are not being allowed to do that. It appears editors who know very little about CST are choosing what is left up. I do not understand the coding for Wikipedia and it will take time for me to read all of that. In the meantime, why are you leaving erroneous slanted information on this page? CranioSacral Knowledge (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Eric Decker
Sorry, I won't do it again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE4A:9B60:940A:33B5:449C:10F5 (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Eric Decker Guy
Sorry for editing Decker. I won't do it again. Have a good evening. 2602:306:CE4A:9B60:8522:E1B5:F10A:495C (talk) 22:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Dreaded 45 day list at ACC
Hello, just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface to avoid account suspension. If you know you're not going to be active it's best to suspend your account, then you just poke a tool admin to re-activate it, just let me know which way you want to go. Thanx, -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 23:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Edit to Cy Vance page
Hi there, you reverted an edit I made to the Cyrus Vance Jr. bio concerning active, reported allegations, that were described as allegations and linked to 4 recognised media outlets reporting the same detail.

One of these was the Guardian.

Could you please tell me what qualifies as reliable sources, if these don't? Are they too editorial?

RMFK (talk) 15:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, thanks for the note. Almost of the sources you included in Cy Vance were editorials. According to WP:NEWSORG, "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact." I highly suggest finding more neutral, opinionated articles to include in your addition. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   16:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Aah, gotcha, thank you very much for the feedback, greatly appreciated.

RMFK (talk) 16:12, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I disagree with LuK3 here. Three of the four sources appear to be non-editorial and reliable. But no matter, it looks like you too worked things out. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:


 * https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.


 * Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
Wishing LuK3 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

A Barnstar Award for You!

 * Haha, thank you very much for the award, I appreciate it! --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

URGENT: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information now
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation.

This is a reminder to acknowledge and sign the new Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. As you know, your volunteer role in Wikimedia projects gives you access to secure and sensitive information.

The new version includes one major change.


 * There is a change regarding the way personal data may be released. Accordingly, functionaries must notify the Wikimedia Foundation at check-disclosure@undefinedwikimedia.org before releasing data, in order to obtain a written approval for doing so. The Foundation will respond within 10 days. However, for emergencies, such as cases involving threats of violence, functionaries may release the personal data without such explicit permission, but they should notify the Foundation immediately following the disclosure. If they choose not to disclose the data, the request for disclosure should be forwarded to the Foundation's emergency email address (emergency@undefinedwikimedia.org).

There are also some wording changes that were made to more closely align the language with evolving industry norms, best practices and laws. The most notable of these has been the change of the term "nonpublic information" to "nonpublic personal data". None of these changes are intended to make fundamental changes to the scope or practice of the policy but we know they could appear as such, hence wanted to flag them.

The aforementioned changes require users that have already signed the previous version of the policy to sign the new version as well.

We therefore ask that you to sign the updated version. Signing the agreement is tracked on Phabricator's Legalpad. An online guide is available to help you with signing the agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign. If you wish you can sign it directly at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L37. The exact policy is located here: Access to nonpublic personal data policy. The text of the confidentiality agreement is located here: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information

If you have already received this message and signed the updated agreement, you need not sign it again. Once is sufficient. In this case, we ask that you respond to Samuel (WMF) letting him know when (date) and how (method/process of signing) you have signed it so that we can update our own records.

Note: please bear in mind that if you still haven’t signed the updated version of the Confidentiality Agreement by February 13, 2019 your rights will be removed.

Thank you for your understanding,

Samuel Guebo (User:Samuel (WMF)), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

URGENT: Only 3 weeks left to sign the new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation.

This is a reminder to acknowledge and sign the new Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. As you know, your volunteer role in Wikimedia projects gives you access to secure and sensitive information.

The new version includes one major change.


 * There is a change regarding the way personal data may be released. Accordingly, functionaries must notify the Wikimedia Foundation at check-disclosure@wikimedia.org before releasing data, in order to obtain a written approval for doing so. The Foundation will respond within 10 days. However, for emergencies, such as cases involving threats of violence, functionaries may release the personal data without such explicit permission, but they should notify the Foundation immediately following the disclosure. If they choose not to disclose the data, the request for disclosure should be forwarded to the Foundation's emergency email address (emergency@wikimedia.org).

There are also some wording changes that were made to more closely align the language with evolving industry norms, best practices and laws. The most notable of these has been the change of the term "nonpublic information" to "nonpublic personal data". None of these changes are intended to make fundamental changes to the scope or practice of the policy but we know they could appear as such, hence wanted to flag them.

The aforementioned changes require users that have already signed the previous version of the policy to sign the new version as well.

We therefore ask that you to sign the updated version. Signing the agreement is tracked on Phabricator's Legalpad. An online guide is available to help you with signing the agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign. If you wish you can sign it directly at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L37. The exact policy is located here: Access to nonpublic personal data policy. The text of the confidentiality agreement is located here: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information

If you have already received this message and signed the updated agreement, you need not sign it again. Once is sufficient. In this case, we ask that you respond to Samuel (WMF) letting him know when (date) and how (method/process of signing) you have signed it so that we can update our own records.

Note: please bear in mind that if you still haven’t signed the updated version of the Confidentiality Agreement by February 13, 2019 your rights will be removed.

Thank you for your understanding,

Samuel Guebo (User:Samuel (WMF)), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 17:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

URGENT: 2 weeks left to sign the new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation.

This is a reminder to acknowledge and sign the new Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. As you know, your volunteer role in Wikimedia projects gives you access to secure and sensitive information.

The new version includes one major change.


 * There is a change regarding the way personal data may be released. Accordingly, functionaries must notify the Wikimedia Foundation at check-disclosure@wikimedia.org before releasing data, in order to obtain a written approval for doing so. The Foundation will respond within 10 days. However, for emergencies, such as cases involving threats of violence, functionaries may release the personal data without such explicit permission, but they should notify the Foundation immediately following the disclosure. If they choose not to disclose the data, the request for disclosure should be forwarded to the Foundation's emergency email address (emergency@wikimedia.org).

There are also some wording changes that were made to more closely align the language with evolving industry norms, best practices and laws. The most notable of these has been the change of the term "nonpublic information" to "nonpublic personal data". None of these changes are intended to make fundamental changes to the scope or practice of the policy but we know they could appear as such, hence wanted to flag them.

The aforementioned changes require users that have already signed the previous version of the policy to sign the new version as well.

We therefore ask that you to sign the updated version. Signing the agreement is tracked on Phabricator's Legalpad. An online guide is available to help you with signing the agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign. If you wish you can sign it directly at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L37. The exact policy is located here: Access to nonpublic personal data policy. The text of the confidentiality agreement is located here: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information

If you have already received this message and signed the updated agreement, you need not sign it again. Once is sufficient. In this case, we ask that you respond to Samuel (WMF) letting him know when (date) and how (method/process of signing) you have signed it so that we can update our own records.

Note: please bear in mind that if you still haven’t signed the updated version of the Confidentiality Agreement by February 13, 2019 your rights will be removed.

Thank you for your understanding,

Samuel Guebo (User:Samuel (WMF)), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 17:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)'

URGENT: LuK3, your Account Creator rights are at risk. Please sign now
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation.

This is a reminder to acknowledge and sign the new Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. As you know, your volunteer role in Wikimedia projects gives you access to secure and sensitive information.

We therefore ask that you to sign the updated version. Signing the agreement is tracked on Phabricator's Legalpad. An online guide is available to help you with signing the agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign. If you wish you can sign it directly at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L37. The exact policy is located here: Access to nonpublic personal data policy. The text of the confidentiality agreement is located here: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information

Note: please bear in mind that if you still haven’t signed the updated version of the Confidentiality Agreement by February 13, 2019 your rights will be removed.

Thank you for your understanding,

Samuel Guebo (User:Samuel (WMF)), Wikimedia Foundation -- 17:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18


Hello ,

, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
 * Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
 * Reliable Sources for NPP

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
 * Backlog drive coming soon


 * News
 * Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.


 * Discussions of interest
 * A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
 * There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
 * What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019


Hello ,

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important. Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR. The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever. NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so  you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations. Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for  the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging. Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway. School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * QUALITY of REVIEWING
 * Backlog
 * Move to draft
 * Notifying users
 * PERM
 * Other news

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

the hermit crabs
I did not see that I did that.My little brother saw that I made a wiki account and as i was getting water he messed with some things.Please forgive the actions of my brother. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historian Harvard (talk • contribs) 00:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Francis M. Jackson page edits
Greetings Luk3,

Thank you for the kind welcome! I am actually Francis Jackson and personally made the edits to the Francis M. Jackson page. I certainly appreciate and understand the potential conflict of interest which is why I limited my alterations to my practice areas (which are of low-controversy and amenable to objective confirmation) and adding a photograph of myself (which I, as the owner of the photo, am uniquely positioned to release the rights to). If any of the foregoing still poses a problem, please let me know. FMJacksonEsq (talk) 20:59, 5 September 2019 (UTC)