User talk:LuLu3


 * I've contacted the blocking admin for comment; in the meantime, please bear with us, and thank you for your patience. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Question - second chance to do what? This is an obvious sock account with no useful edits.  Rklawton 02:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * No this is not a sock account. I admit that I did make some inappropriate edits, but I have been banned for 6 months so far, and I think that another chance is warranted.  LuLu3 04:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I notice that some of the accounts in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of LuLu3 have been used in the past month; considering that, how can I take your claim of having been "good" for six months at face value? – Luna Santin  (talk) 04:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You will notice that these are "suspected sock puppets". You have my word that this is the ony account I have ever used.  LuLu3 23:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

A quick look at your edit history dispels that notion at a glance. Novice users wouldn't have a clue about blanking a user's archive page - let alone do it as a first edit. Rklawton 23:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * On another note, I've seen at least one sockpuppet requesting unblocking on the same grounds, following the decline on this unblock request; that brings the supposed good faith second chance this user is asking for into serious question. You had a second chance. And a third, and a fourth. Continued lies aren't going to get you another one. – Luna Santin  (talk) 00:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, that Lucille Ball article was being vandalized long before I registered for Wikipedia. You have no proof that I am the vandal, you are just assuming so.  It is much easier to assume, that to investigate the truth.  LuLu3 03:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

You are not getting unblocked.
You are not getting unblocked, and I am requesting this talkpage to be fully protected, as you are harrassing admins and abusing the right to edit this page. Meateater 10:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)