User talk:Luann.yetter


 * }

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. In addition to the concerns below, please see Articles for creation for the template for requesting sandbox → new article. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

User:Luann.yetter/sandbox → Luann Yetter – I am requesting this move from my user page to the encyclopedia because I'm new and can't do it myself. Luann.yetter (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC) You are however welcome to stay on wikipedia as a user. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:46, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose for several reasons, among these:
 * sorry to disappoint you, Luann, but you don't seem to be notable enough to have an article in wikipedia,
 * even if you were notable enough, it would be a conflict of interest if you edited an article on yourself,
 * wikipedia is not a site where you post your resumes.
 * Oppose no notability given. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment you should have written this article in your sandbox, per WP:USD, and your userpage should not be used as a draft article, per WP:UP. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 05:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment since the draft was renamed to User:Luann.yetter/sandbox from User:Luann.yetter, this discussion should be transferred to User talk:Luann.yetter/sandbox. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

COI
Hello Luann.yetter. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)