User talk:Luaza1313

Welcome!
Hello, Luaza1313, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Soetermans. T / C 14:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Star Wars 1313
Hi Luaza1313,

Maybe you're a big fan of Star Wars, like I am, and that you would like to see Star Wars 1313 actually being released someday. However, unless you have some new information that can be backed up with a source, removing "cancelled" from the article and the Star Wars video games templates is not helpful. If you do though, feel free to add that information! --Soetermans. T / C 14:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Nuclear warfare does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  14:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Soetermans. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Star Wars 1313, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Again, you will need a source. It still *is* cancelled, it is not "on hold". Do you have new information? Add it!'' Soetermans. T / C 11:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Another questionable edit. Look, you do not have to communicate with me or other editors, but you will have to follow guidelines. --Soetermans. T / C 13:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Techno-thriller
You claim that this is not related to or a genre of Science fiction - yet everything about this article argue that is highly related (but with a complex relationship with SciFi.

Please desist from editing in this way until you have argued the case with other interested editors on the relevant talk pages. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  16:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. ''You seem to be editing while logged out as 85.173.179.178 to restore some of your disputed edits. Rather than edit warring, please discuss the issues on the articles' talk pages. Thanks.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 01:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Techno-thriller. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Can you please stop your unconstructive editing and actually communicate with other editors? You've crossed the three revert rule a couple of times now, using several IPs.'' Soetermans. T / C 13:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Eagle Eye & science-fiction
The article doesn't reflect it yet, but Eagle Eye was nominated by the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror Films for a 2009 Saturn Award for "Best Science Fiction Film". It handily qualifies as a science-fiction film, so please don't remove such designators from the article. Thanks! —  fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  15:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

A talk page guideline
Hello, Luaza1313. I noticed this recent edit of yours, on a talk page. On an article, that would have been good, but there's Wikipedia guideline that, with very few exceptions, it's better not to edit other editors' talk page posts. This is explained at WP:TPO. Not a big deal in this case, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. Thanks. — Mudwater (Talk) 00:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello. About your recent edits on Talk:List of superhero television series -- specifically, this and this -- it's against the Wikipedia talk page guidelines to remove other editors' comments.  This is explained at WP:TPO.  Thanks.  — Mudwater (Talk) 17:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:List of superhero television series, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 15:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Do NOT edit other users' talk page comments, even to correct a typo. Do NOT edit other users' talk page comments.
 * Once someone has responded to a comment you have made on a talk page, do NOT edit your comment. Changing the wording of your statement changes the meaning of the other person's comment. Changing the date and time of your comment makes it look like the other person responded to you BEFORE you commented. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Banner shell
WikiProjectBannerShell redirects to WikiProject banner shell so no need to replace the latter with the former. The parameters 'class' and 'importance' are also determined automatically on category talk pages so do not need to be added. Tim! (talk) 09:00, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I understand that. luaza1313 09:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I see that you continue to make such edits, for example . Please stop. -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

So parameters "class and "importance are determined automatically in talk pages of categories. Ok I will not add parameters in talk pages of categories .I will add WikiProjects if talk pages of categories are empty. luaza1313 18:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Why do you continue to make these changes ? Tim! (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Because I want make more contributions.Mainly I add WikiProjects in talk pages if talk pages don't have WikiProjects. luaza1313 11:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * But you didn't add any WikiProjects, you changed the order of two that were already present, and added the parameters Categoryimportance, which as I stated above, are completely redundant. Compare the with the : other then the order of the WikiProject banners, and the order of the categories at the bottom, there is no difference at all. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I changed order of WikiProjects in the category because this category is about British Motorsport. luaza1313 11:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So why didn't you add ? But apart from that, changing the order was wrong, since the articles are primarily about motorsport, and secondarily about the United Kingdom. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Because I did not know about this WikiProject. luaza1313 11:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject rater gadget
From your contribution history it seems to me you might be interested in this tool for WikiProject-assessing: User:Kephir/gadgets/rater. I find it very useful and it has saved me countless hours of time already. Just wanted to let you know about it.

--Fixuture (talk) 16:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Skyline (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Source
You removed a source specifically covering Inspector Gadget and similar science fiction concepts because you disagree with it. This is not the way it works in Wikipedia. You can not reject sources that do not fit your definition. Dimadick (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

So you think whe should discuss in discussion page ? luaza1313 18:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes. I am under the impression you are gutting the article and removing available sources, in an article that relies way too much on websites.

The Scott source you removed is an Oxford University Press source which cites different definitions and uses of "cyborg" in real life and science fiction. Inspector Gadget is specifically covered as one of the science fiction examples and the similarities with other uses of the concept noted. Which is far more detailed than the Metacritic article. You removed the source as self-published. Dimadick (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

You did not answer my question.luaza1313 18:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I answered "yes". And I am initiating discussion. What did you think the above comment was? Dimadick (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Maybe in talk page of Inspector Gadget I will explain why science fiction as a genre should be removed. luaza1313 15:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a comment on the page List of superhero television series that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 16:19, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on K.C. Undercover. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 14:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at True Blood. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''You were warned previously about adding categories to articles which their text did not support, but appear to still be doing so, in addition to your other problematic behaviors. Please stop.'' DonIago (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2017
Hello, I'm Dpm12. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scooby-Doo related articles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't change or add genres without reliable sources Dpm12 (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Max Payne. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Do not add genres without a reliable source. Do not add categories that are not supported with a reliable source in the article.'' Magnolia677 (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Max Payne 3. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

I understand that. luaza1313 12:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you want to add Category:Neo-noir to articles, then somewhere in the article "neo-noir" (or something similar) needs to be mentioned, with a source. Just because you feel that this category or genre fits, it needs to be supported.  Please don't edit war over this.  Discuss your reasons on the article's talk page.  Magnolia677 (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

So you think I should add source in my summary ? luaza1313 12:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You need to be sure that the category you add is supported with a source in the article. Please see WP:CATDEF which states "It should be clear from verifiable information in the article you added  why it was placed in each of its categories".  I read through a few of the articles you added Category:Neo-noir to and it was not clear, or the article did not contain sources to support the category.  If I add the category "punk rock bands" to an article about a band, it means that somewhere in the article it must be very clearly stated, with a source, that this band plays punk rock.  If you feel your category is appropriate, discuss it on one of the article's talk pages, or leave a detailed edit summary explaining your reason.  The reason your talk page is filled with warnings is because you are not supporting your edits with a reason or source.  Magnolia677 (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for running unapproved bot scripts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Under the bot policy, all automated scripts must be approved by the Bot Approvals Group to ensure that they perform safe and useful functions without stressing system resources. Ron h jones (Talk) 17:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 104 pages changed in 49 min (Category talk:xxxx in Finnish sport) would be going some for a normal bot and impossible for normal editing. Please obtain proper bot approval or WP:AWB approval. Do not repeat this editing system without approval. Ron h jones (Talk) 17:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

I am not a bot.I don't have any bots. luaza1313 12:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at K.C. Undercover. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 17:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. You have had a long string of warnings by different editors to which you appear not to be paying heed. During this enforced break please take the opportunity to read and reflect on the advice that has been given to you, above. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Just Chilling (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)}}

Sockpuppet investigation
Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Sum mer PhD v2.0 20:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)