User talk:Lucaas/Archive 1

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --ScienceApologist 23:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Removing Warnings
Please see Removing warnings on how to properly remove warnings (if it is appropriate to do so). Your best bet is to just archive the information on a regular basis. This allows other users to view your history, without actually going to your "history" tab and having to click over edit to see what it was about. I'm am attempting to help you on this because you will eventually create such a problem with disobeying admin directions that you may be blocked indefinitely, and I would prefer that not happen. See Archive on how to archive a page (it's really simple and it only takes a couple minutes of copying and pasting). Bignole 13:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I applaud you for going through with the archiving, but remember that you have to place the blocks and warnings in there, you cannot pick and choose those. You can however pick and choose regular messages from other editors, and seeing as you didn't want the "refactor" in your talk page I think it will be fine to remove that. Bignole 13:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

The page to which you refer on warnings, says that it is out of date! Also another user dumped a whole load of stuff in there Lucas


 * I know it's inactive, but it is still used as a guideline. If you have warnings (not block messages) that were never acted upon, then after some time you may be able to get an admin to remove them on the grounds that you have kept good behavior while editing. Normally though, they will not be removed by another editor, and under no circumstances should YOU actually remove them because that will just piss off the editor that gave you the warning and cause them to report you for removal. I've seen people get blocked for 24 hours for removing them. It's best to just keep them and forget about it. Just put them all in the archive section. Bignole 13:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Unsourced image tagging is considered a warning as well. You can't simply erase your talk page when you feel like it. I thought we discussed this. Bignole 11:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Heidegger2.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Heidegger2.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)