User talk:Lucafg74

Compulsion Games
Hi, this may not be your intent, but the article does read a bit like a PR piece instead of an unbiased article. I posted a request to the Video Game WikiProject team asking them to help you out, if that's OK. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

I have no link with Compulsion Games. You can read my statement in my user page. I'll follow your advice and will try to correct the style. thanks. Lucafg74 (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

No worries, I didn't think you were. Good luck, and thanks for the contribution. I did a double take when I saw this new article pop up, since We Happy Few has gotten quite a bit of coverage as of late (as did Contrast when it came out.) --Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Compulsion Games has been reverted. Your edit here to Compulsion Games was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3jiB9wm-48) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry but i have not understand wiki policy yet. It seems very ambiguos, not coherent, illogical and castrating. I read a lot of wiki page about companies and their website are in the reference links! Search for The Chinese Room (another game company) and see, please!! Now a lot of moderators mind about my links! Ok, this is a community, i accept your suggestions!! So i trust you and accept your changes! In the meanwhile i'm going to learn more. Perhaps wikipedia try to prevent commercial speculations on its pages. That's fine. But my purposes are of artistic and cultural nature. In the past i contributed a few italian wiki pages about music, cinema, physics. Now i want promote art in videogames, but not to promote any company. I hope you understand. I'm learning to do this at my best, respecting wiki policies. Thanks! Lucafg74 (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

I read the wiki policy about video. This video should be ok to link. So i inserted it again. Lucafg74 (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

You seem to have a conflict of interest when it comes to this subject. Not because you have a direct tie to Compulsion Games, but because you are trying to promote videogames as a form of art, which is what your website is promoting. You say you want to learn and that you want to respect wiki policies, however a bot, and three editors have now mentioned that the edits seem more promotional than anything else. Yet you still refuse to see what is wrong with the edits.

Your example of the lasers in your class is a good one, you can show the laser, mention the type of laser, the manufacturer of the laser, and the specs of the laser; however when you start reading from the manufacturer's sales pitch or quoting the creator on why he created that type of laser and what flaws he saw in other manufacturers that led him to create this laser then you probably have crossed line into a promotional mode. You may not even realize it because of our internal bias.

Finally your user page probably does not currently conform to current user page standards, as it clearly and blatantly promotes your website. VViking Talk Edits 16:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

And what's about the example of physics toys? Lucafg74 (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Ok, i'll remove links to my group. But it is silly, because is a cultural project. Culture must help culture. You see promotion everywhere. I can understand you guys, i can only imagine how many people try to do promotion on wikipedia. But you are wrong with me. Yes, i know where the misunderstanding lies: Compulsion Games is a company, so it is not recognized as an artistic team. But it's wrong. All artist are also sellers of their artwork. Lucafg74 (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Not a good beginning in wikipedia! Perhaps because it is a company! Very castrating! Lucafg74 (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

It takes time, I have been here 4 years, and I am finally feeling a little more comfortable. As long as you are willing to learn and take advice you will do okay. You may even learn to enjoy it. VViking Talk Edits 16:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

List of video games commonly referred to as artistic
Hi Lucafg74, I wanted to let you know that I removed several of your contributions at List of video games commonly referred to as artistic for violating our policies regarding copyrights and plagiarism. We usually aim to summarize what reliable sources say, and in some cases we can quote them but we must always properly attribute those quotations. Basic translations are also a form of plagiarism. Please read WP:COPYVIO and WP:PLAG for more. I also noticed that you're not correctly indenting your comments at Talk:List of video games commonly referred to as artistic, and that you're straying from discussing the article itself. You can read more about those guideliens at WP:TPG and WP:THREAD. Please let me know if you have any questions at all. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 19:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Compulsiongames logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Compulsiongames logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of video games considered artistic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bound. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)