User talk:Lucamilanesio

Welcome!
Hello Lucamilanesio and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Gerrit (software), seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dea db  eef  08:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Hello, I am a Gerrit contributor and I made lots of webinars and talks on Gerrit Code Review. I found the list of links and training resources a bit lacking on this page and I added the link to a book and slide-deck that I made in the past. Let me know why links to training material is considered against the Wikipedia policies.

Thank you in advance

Luca.


 * In short, because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a manual or a how-to guide. See also WP:NOT. That you are the author of those training resources doesn't quite help but instead looks like a conflict of interest. Huon (talk) 10:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

In short then the references could be OK but need to be inserted / edited by someone that does not know me but knows the the links and would like to share them. Is that correct ? Thank you in advance.

Luca.


 * These particular references would likely still suffer some problems, such as "Wikipedia is not a how-to guide" or the fact that the slides were not subject to peer review or editorial oversight of any kind, but someone not associated with you would not have the same conflict of interest. Huon (talk) 10:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the edit conflict. Much appreciated.
 * Please sign your posts with --~ ,
 * add a new section header when starting a new 'conversation'
 * and, to put it a bit more bluntly, those links are NOT acceptable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is neither a manual nor a how-to guide; had you read WP:NOT per the earlier advice of Huon you would have known that.-- Laun  chba  ller  10:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)