User talk:Lucashopstein

February 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Contribution
However the information I put is true. I experienced the whole event so I know what happened. Lucashopstein (talk) 08:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sure it is true. But it needs to be documented in an independent reliable source, which instagram is not. Wikipedia articles are not for documenting users' personal experiences, but are for summarizing what appears in independent sources. 331dot (talk) 08:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The problem is that your word is as good as anyone else's. As Instagram is a self-published source, I could post on it and claim exactly the same thing. Without sources, how would I be any more or less believable than you? That's why "because I said so" is not alone an argument supporting your claim. If you know Disney cast members that well, surely they'd be able to make an official statement on Disney's website certifying it, and then we could cite that.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at It's a Small World, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 08:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)