User talk:Lucasmtavares

Re Arctic Monkeys -- it's not appropriate to give yourself photo credit on Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:07, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucas Tavares
Hello Lucasmtavares,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lucas Tavares for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nick Moyes (talk) 07:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Hello, as a photojournalist, I'm sure you are aware of the need for neutrality and the avoidance of conflict of interest in all your reporting. I'm afraid the same is true here on Wikipedia. It is not an acceptable practice for editors to use Wikipedia to advertise themselves, or to promote organisations that they work for organisations. Thus, the article you appear to have written about yourself (Lucas Tavares) has been flagged for speedy deletion, and the other article you created on Agência O Globo is of concern because it is unsourced and looks like promotional literature, with no references to support its notability. It is often better if an editor with a close connection to a subject simply makes suggestions on the articles' talk pages and leaves it for others who are less closely connected to make the appropriate changes.

Wikipedia really does needs writers and photographers like you who are willing to bring their skills and abilities to improve this amazing encyclopedia, and you are to be encouraged to do just that. But there are a number of policies you should probably read which I hope may help you understand why this is of concern.
 * Conflict of interest
 * Writing about yourself
 * General notability guidelines
 * Notability (organizations and companies)
 * Reliable Sources as references to support articles

I hope this helps, and that you will continue contributing with well-written, informed and neutral content (and maybe some of your own photographic work, too! Note: You might also like to know that we are not allowed to upload other people's work to which we don't personally own copyright, or which hasn't been specificallly authorized by them for free commercial use under an appropriate creative commons licence). Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 09:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucas Tavares


The article Lucas Tavares has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. ToThAc (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucas Tavares for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Tavares is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lucas Tavares until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucas Tavares


A tag has been placed on Lucas Tavares, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Agência O Globo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agência O Globo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Agência O Globo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nick Moyes (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)