User talk:Lucienne.t/Saprotrophic bacteria

Feedback on Saprotrophic Bacteria Wiki article
General


 * The article takes what initially may seem as a niche and complicated subject, and for the most part, explains it thoroughly so that the average reader can understand. The draft is also well written, with no grammatical errors. The nutrient cycling and MEEs section does introduce a lot of terms that may seem confusing to the reader, but for the most part gives decent explanations. Overall, the article does a great job at summarizing Saprotrophic bacteria.

Content


 * All content added was relevant to the topic. The article did an excellent job at briefly defining Saprotrophic bacteria, listing the types of Saprotrophic bacteria, and exploring the many environments the bacteria can be found in. Sources of information were not clearly listed, but I'm sure they will be by the time of the final draft. I do not believe any vital information is missing, but I would love to see how this article will be expanded and incorporated into the final draft.

Tone and balance


 * The article does a good job at remaining neutral in tone and imprinting an unbiased perspective. There aren’t any claims that appear heavily biased, or viewpoints that are over- or under- represented.

Overall impressions


 * Overall, I believe that the content added has generally improved the quality of the article. The content added a much needed “Structure and life cycle” section and explored the different types of saprotrophic bacteria. Although a possible section could be added on exploring how Saprotrophic bacteria interacts/ impacts other organisms or the environment, I do not believe this is necessary.

TheCuad27 (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

some comments
It doesn't seem like you have really added much yet apart from adding some subject headings and doing some reorganization? I'd suggest that a good thing to expand on would be the ecosystem effects of saprotrophic bacteria and their importance for nutrient cycling. Here's a few interesting references I found:

https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-1796.1?casa_token=vgtx3ccJwpsAAAAA%3AubeQFKi9uQZdjeICFRectMwPh8afBMT2F_cN5WZQbzORIqsrlDqZSPmAy94FHZ64tzSd7oNq0F0kyQ

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01106.x

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369527416301564?casa_token=0vsXiInhQKgAAAAA:6aiZn-V24wwka4OwVMoiXf8rkUhFvtlIjqe5D_814nw8ug6qI_HG3pKawKanPAOfFGG-cZ4ipA#bib0455

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071710001689?casa_token=B-X-zTc63sQAAAAA:MbUXSznw4z8X7k-b21A7Yi9DvdNuMVBVhrtju0hVZWlyVG37TeGtKdvXVt6c3MnIIgDzm_9onQ 67.249.84.205 beanstash (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)