User talk:Lucila Acassuso

Welcome!
Hello, Lucila Acassuso, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:DAN ARENZON, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Qcne  (talk)  14:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DAN ARENZON


A tag has been placed on Draft:DAN ARENZON, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Qcne  (talk)  14:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article: Draft:DAN ARENZON
Hi @Lucila Acassuso

Your draft article Draft:DAN ARENZON reads like a curriculum vitae or a résumé, not an encyclopaedic article. Remember that Wikipedia is not a place for any type of self-promotion or advertisement. It is also worth reading Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé.

Dan might meet the Notability (people) criteria for a Wikipedia article, but you need to find sources that cover him in detail, and then summarise them in your own words. That should make up the content of your article draft. Note that the sources must be:


 * - Reliable: Your article should rely on strong, reliable sources that are published by reputable institutions. Primary sources can be used for basic facts (such as a date of birth), but they should be supplemented with strong secondary sources that offer analysis or interpretation.
 * - Independent: Your sources should be independent of the subject, for example not self-published or from the subject's own website.
 * - Show significant coverage: Your subject should be discussed in detail in the sources you find. The sources should provide in-depth information or analysis about the subject, going beyond basic facts or promotional material.
 * - From multiple places: You should find at least three separate reliable, independent, secondary sources that discuss your subject.
 * - Not original research: Wikipedia articles should summarise existing knowledge about a subject, not present new research. This means you should avoid drawing your own conclusions or analyses from the sources. Stick to summarising what the sources say in a neutral tone.

Remember that your article should be written from a Neutral point of view.

If you cannot find multiple, reliable, and independent sources then I am afraid that Dan would not meet the notability threshold at this time and therefore cannot have a Wikipedia article.

Finally, please note that if you are connected in any way to Dan then you must declare your Conflict of interest. We also strongly discourage you from creating an article about yourself!

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here: Get help at the Teahouse

Hope that helps,  Qcne  (talk)  14:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)