User talk:Luckibrian

Nomination of Pell Mell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pell Mell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pell Mell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS 4444 Talk  19:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Luckibrian, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Citadel of Faith Covenant Church has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Diannaa, I am the Website Lead for Citadel of Faith, so I didn't think there would be a copyright issue. (How can I verify this?) The problem is, Citadel of Faith is incorrectly redirecting to "Temple Beth-El" for some reason, so I am trying to correct this. It's messing up our Google search results. Luckibrian (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Citadel of Faith Covenant Church


The article Citadel of Faith Covenant Church has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCHURCH. The sources provided are closely linked to the church and its pastor, and a WP:BEFORE search yields little substantive content."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Heli (biblical figure) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See WP:RNPOV. tgeorgescu (talk)  19:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The paragraph in question currently begins: "If Matthew's genealogy is that of Mary, and Luke's of Joseph...". It appears that a simple mistake was made of interposing the names "Matthew" and "Luke," because the common suggestion is actually that Luke’s genealogy is that of Mary, and Matthew’s genealogy is that of Joseph — not the other way around.  In fact, earlier in this very article (in the section titled "Two genealogies of Jesus"), it is mentioned that the common suggestion is "Matthew's account follows the lineage of Joseph, while Luke's follows the lineage of Mary." This can also be verified via the following references:   Luckibrian (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * To cut a long story short, there is no genealogy of Mary in the Bible. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Then why include an entire section addressing the premise that “Matthew's genealogy is that of Mary”? Why not delete the entire section, or else correct the premise so that it corresponds to the common suggestion that Luke’s genealogy is that of Mary? Luckibrian (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * We do render it as notable opinion, not as WP:THETRUTH. tgeorgescu (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems less than neutral to include in this section the relatively obscure opinion that “Matthew's genealogy is that of Mary” without also including the much more common opinion that “Luke’s genealogy is that of Mary.” Luckibrian (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't oppose having both views in the article. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * That sounds agreeable to me. Luckibrian (talk) 01:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)