User talk:Luckyaim/Archive 1

Proposed deletion of Muhammad Najeeb Sultan


The article Muhammad Najeeb Sultan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced biography, assertions of notability per WP:BIO unsupported, no significant coverage online in English from WP:Reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 09:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Shrinetowers.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shrinetowers.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Innershrine3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Innershrine3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Innershrine1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Innershrine1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Innershrine.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Innershrine.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Darbarsharif.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Darbarsharif.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Hooallahm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hooallahm.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
ww2censor (talk) 03:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mian meer.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mian meer.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Abdul Qadir Gilani.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abdul Qadir Gilani.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jillani shrine.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jillani shrine.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sultan Bahoo.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sultan Bahoo.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Hafiz Faiz Sultan.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hafiz Faiz Sultan.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sultan Bahoo.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Sultan Bahoo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fred the Oyster (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Disagree with deletion proposal of my images
Disagree I dont understand how you guys can do such baseless discussion? Without taking a deep-breath and thinking what is it all about? Just to secure points? I do not agree, rather, I dont understand the deletion proposal of images File:Mian meer.jpg File:Abdul Qadir Gilani.JPG File:Jillani shrine.jpg File:Sultan Bahoo.jpg File:Hafiz Faiz Sultan.jpg. It is unfair to propose these images for deletion while the images neither commercial nor come under any copyright act. All images are of religious and the noblest figures among entire Muslim communities. Muslims and all other human beings feel proud to distribute their pictures and message of peace. Though Im not Muslim, but I feel regard for such personalities either in Muslim or any other religion. My contradiction to deletion proposal is also based on following points:
 * These images are purely my own camera taken (almost 2-3 years ago) pictures and have been uploaded on different public sharing, commercial, informatory sites and web-profiles. (Does anyone think there is any problem to upload /copy same images on wiki projects too?)
 * These are not scanned images, actually, but camera taken images from 'photo frames' (somehow mounted frames). (One can notice it easily with deep observation)
 * The images are of historical personalities or public figures, that already have died hundreds of years ago, hence no copyright law is applied.
 * One of the files, File:Jillani shrine.jpg, is a historical building, thus exempted from copyright issues.
 * If you ask any Muslim or follower of these personalities, they would certainly say, YES... these pictures and material should be published in any way.

By the way Fred the Oyster Im expert not only in Muslim Sufism, my upcoming contribution in Hinduism and Christianity articles and pictures would be huge. Please tell me, what else should I do to prove that these images do not violate copyright and belong to me. I Disagree with deletion proposal or discussion of such noble personality pictures.

Since I've declared my newness to wiki projects, some bullies are creepily ramming on my uploads and edits. An important thing I want to bring into kind knowledge of Admins, few old users are being offensive with new users (as Im), such bully behavior should be spurned and scorned. Thanks Lucky's Heaven - (Talk to Lucky) 03:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * You can disagree as much as you like with the deletion nominations but unfortunately you do not understand copyright. You did not make these images yourself, so you cannot claim they are in the public domain, you just copied them from other websites and the copyright status is not clear. We do not accept images if we cannot be sure of the copyright because we take copyright status very seriously. We cannot accept these images no matter how important the subjects of the images are and you cannot prove the image are freely licenced. If you want to keep such images a good start is to show who and when the image was made as well as showing the source and its date and country of first publication. With that information we can evaluate the images but right now these images don't have that information. You may find it useful to read my image copyright information page to familarise yourself with some of the issues such images have. You can dispute any of the proposed deletions on the appropriate discussion page where the reasons are given which is what those pages are for but trying to persuade me by leaving messages on my talk page will not alter my reason for nominating any images. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 04:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, thanks for your reply. I do understand your position and concerns. I think you didnt see the flickr page where these images are first uploaded. The page has my identification details. As far as source, date and country of publication is concerned, well, I can provide those information please let me know:

1) To whom should I show such information? 2) What do you mean by 'source'? How can I show the image source? And YES.. I can talk to you on your talk page. But as you mentioned 'you can talk anywhere', so, for my convenience I offered you to talkback. (I thought you would be cooperative with new wikipedians.) I didnt know, it could be your status quo problem. Thanks Lucky's Heaven - (Talk to Lucky) 11:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * You need to provide all the source details in each individual image file page so we can verify the details. Indeed I did see the Flickr pages but again just because you claim images to be public domain does not prove they are. As previously mentioned you can discuss each image nominated for deletion on the deletion page and where images are noted as missing details, add the missing information to the image page, then an administrator will review the deletion nomination and determine if the new added information clarifies the issue or not. I am happy to help you but there is really no need to post on my talk page, just follow the links in the notices on each image, as they are not all the same, and provide the missing information. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sultan Bahoo shrine.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sultan Bahoo shrine.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 05:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sultan Bahoo shrine3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sultan Bahoo shrine3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Peer meher ali.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peer meher ali.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 05:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Prophet Muhammad Grave.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Prophet Muhammad Grave.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prophet Muhammad Grave.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Prophet Muhammad Grave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sultan Bahoo shrine2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sultan Bahoo shrine2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sabir piya.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sabir piya.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Khatam ghousia.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Khatam ghousia.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sultan bahoo poetry2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sultan bahoo poetry2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sultan bahoo poetry.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sultan bahoo poetry.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sultan Bahoo shrine4.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sultan Bahoo shrine4.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Najeeb Sultan Bahoo.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Najeeb Sultan Bahoo.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Molapak3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Molapak3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 16:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Luckyaim

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarwari Qadiri
A tag has been placed on Sarwari Qadiri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sadads (talk) 13:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Muhammad Najeeb Sultan.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Muhammad Najeeb Sultan.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)