User talk:Lucyblanchard

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhead Group
 The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! TheOneSean &#124; Talk to me 11:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of Rhead Group
Hello Lucyblanchard,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rhead Group for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,  Dewritech (talk)  12:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest (you clearly have one)
Hello, Lucyblanchard. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rhead Group, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I'll add that it's also bad form to come to Wikipedia and start editing articles in a topic you're closely associated with, without disclosing your conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Promotion and notability
Even though you tried to write the article about your employer in non-promotional language, it is difficult to tell when something you wrote is promotional when you have a conflict of interest, and easy to determine for those of us on the outside. Conflict of interest describes how you should conduct yourself here.

Wikipedia has many policies, one of which is What Wikipedia is not. Of those things listed, of particular importance is the fact that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia first. Wikipedia is not a channel for publicity or promotion.

We also have notability guidelines that determine what topics merit inclusion in the encyclopedia. The relevant guideline in this case is WP:CORP. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rhead Group concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rhead Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rhead Group


Hello Lucyblanchard. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rhead Group".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)