User talk:Lucyconlon

Welcome!

Hello, Lucyconlon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Xavier Autrey, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Xavier Autrey


The article Xavier Autrey has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

I have tidied up the article to make it easier to read and understand, but it still needs referencing. Ideally, every fact should be properly cited. I have carried out a Google search on him, but cannot find any useful links. There are however, several negative references to him, such as his arrest on tax fraud, his alleged mis-management of AHMSA and his links to George W. Bush. Some of this should be mentioned in the article, which presently makes him out to be a paragon of virtue. I have not added the arrest into the article as it was in 2004 and to be balanced, should be brought up to date. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:41, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the note - there is no doubt that Mr Autrey meets the level of notability to have a wikipedia article, so there is no danger of the article being deleted on those grounds. I will look at the references later. Best wishes from England. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 15:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Fred Willard at Farm Sanctuary Gala, NY.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fred Willard at Farm Sanctuary Gala, NY.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:26, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Angie McCartney (September 10)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, Lucyconlon. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ruth McCartney, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:10, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

That's because I am waiting for it to be approved before I edit more of it. Lucyconlon (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Lucy

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney


Hello Lucyconlon. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Angie McCartney".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Angie McCartney concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Angie McCartney, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Angie McCartney


Hello, Lucyconlon. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Angie McCartney".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Abbey Road. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 22:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I've dealt with this on my talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2018
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Matthew Nelson into Gunnar Nelson (musician), while some of it was already present. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:49, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

I have NO IDEA how to reply to you or if yu will even get this as there is no "reply" button only a "talk" button so here goes....but I am simply making sure that as TWINS IN THE SAME BAND they have the same discography. Am I really supposed to RETYPE everything? Wouldn't common sense just let me copy and paste it? I do not get why this is such a crime. user:lucyconlonLucyconlon (talk) 02:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I got it. You can also leave a talkback template on my talk page, but Reply to has become the preferred method.
 * The twins' articles do not need to be the same, but if you want to include similar, or even the same content, be sure not to duplicate it without checking. there were two paragraphs that started "Nelson co-founded the Stone Canyon Records", two sentences discussing their cover of "Jingle Bell Rock", along with the rest of that paragraph. The next paragraph was a duplicate as well. The only new paragraph was the Ricky Nelson Remembered show, which was formatted incorrectly. None of the content included the references from other article, and of course the last had none so it made sense not to copy its reference. The crime can be explained by an appeal to copyright law. Feel free to read the Copying within Wikipedia article that's linked above and ask questions there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gunnar Nelson (musician); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ST47 (talk) 00:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Proposed deletion of Xavier Autrey


The article Xavier Autrey has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Can only find passing mentions of the subject, even in Spanish language sources. Appears to fail WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Missvain (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  22:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)