User talk:Lucyluuuuuuu

Welcome!

Hello, Lucyluuuuuuu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lucy archer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mathonius (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucy archer


A tag has been placed on Lucy archer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mathonius (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brit Awards, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mathonius (talk) 12:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wilmington Grammar School for Girls. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wilmington Grammar School for Girls was changed by Lucyluuuuuuu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955233 on 2012-03-07T12:52:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Hmmm...at least part of your edits were not exactly helpful; and all information added should be sustained by reliable sources

Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dartford Grammar School for Girls, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:59, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a real encyclopedia that people use to get information. If you know how to do good research writing, we're happy to have your help.  If you don't know how to do good research writing yet, please focus on learning that in school, and in the meantime, just read Wikipedia without changing it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
You have been given good advice above; do not throw a tantrum, it is childish.

Lectonar (talk) 13:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Calm down. I am a Ninja, and this is my master . 13:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbbiAbernathy (talk • contribs)

In response to your feedback
Listen, you may know everything about the schools you're editing, but you're not sourcing anything. Anything that's unverified is deleted, check out this and try to calm down. Okay? We're all in this together, and Lectonar didn't do anything wrong. Honestly, you were posting multiple feedback posts in all caps, so technically you were throwing a tantrum. Please just calm down and sort to this matter constructively.

I am a Ninja, and this is my master . 13:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * You're trying to do an adult job- write an encyclopedia that people all over the world use. That's a real writing job, and requires high-level writing skills.  It's pretty clear that you are a kid.  It's okay that you are a kid, and it's okay that you don't know how to write an encyclopedia yet.  There are probably a lot of things you don't know how to do yet, that you will learn how to do as you get older.  You wouldn't get angry if people told you that you shouldn't do brain surgery or play professional football, right?  No big deal.  Eventually, you'll learn how to do research, how to choose facts that are verified by sources, and how to cite those sources.  People generally start learning that around age 13, and get good at it around age 18-20.  Just read the articles, and enjoy them, and don't be mad that you don't know how to write them yet.  Just like you might go to a movie and enjoy it without being mad that they wouldn't let you work the cameras. Relax, and learn.  Wikipedia will still be here when you learn how to write an encyclopedia article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 13:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Please read WP:NPOV

Kc kennylau (talk) 07:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Please read WP:NPOV, and we don't support vandalisms.

Kc kennylau (talk) 10:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Please read WP:NPOV, and we don't support vandalisms.

Kc kennylau (talk) 10:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;