User talk:Lucysworld

Welcome!
Hello, Lucysworld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The bullets production team, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA talkcontribs 03:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of "The bullets production team"
A page you created, The bullets production team, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. RA talkcontribs 03:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi, thanks for email. I deleted your article because  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:01, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave some references, they did not seem to meet the source criteria as linked. Wikipedia is not acceptable as a souce anyway.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: made an impact... 65million records sold worldwide... company has expanded... success of their work... consistent catalog... award-winning songs... and so on, just spam really
 * Given the history of this article, it's likely that you have a conflict of interest when it comes to editing on this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

It's always better if articles about organisations are written by people who aren't affiliated, we have more of a problem when they are written by the company PR person.

It's entirely up to you, but if you want, you could do a draft here and let me know when you have done, if you want further comments.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

draft
Thanks for email. The tone is better, but I think you still have some problems with independent verifiable sources to establish notability. http://www.artistdirect.com/artist/credits/greg-lawson/457172, if it was acceptable, would become Greg Lawson at Artists Direct. Use * to produce a bulletted list like this one.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You don't actually have a "References" section.
 * Even if I assume that the "External links" section is references, there are problems. The J-Lo one can't be accessed in the UK because a court order (!!!), and the other two seem to be unacceptable. It looks to me as if you can self-add to these sites, and both are selling stuff, so obviously not independent. You need proper references to eg newspapers, follow the link above to see what can be used.
 * It would help if you added links to existing articles. I've added one for Tupak, but there are plenty more for performers and companies. The assumption is going to be that if you don't link, there is no article, so not notable. People reading this won't be experts.
 * Instead of writing bare urls in "References" or "External links". Make them more user friendly using [url description], so
 * Have a look at Tupac Shakur. You certainly don't need that much detail, but it may help you with how to lay out an article.