User talk:Ludivine1989

Welcome!

Hello, Ludivine1989, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Biorébus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ➜Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  02:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Biorébus


A tag has been placed on Biorébus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ➜Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  02:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Biorébus


A tag has been placed on Biorébus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jenks24 (talk) 09:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I recognize that the original speedy deletion request did not seem to understnad the nature of the group, but I think this is the simplest solution to avoid an unprofitable debate was to redirect  it to the page on Laurent Schwartz (oncologist). Given that some of these theories are not necessarily generally accepted now, at least in their original form, I reworded it a little to match our practice here at the English Wikipedia to clearly indicate this. It will be necessary to more clearly give 3rd party references both to their work,  and also to discussions of it. (and also in the article on Schwarz). The article on Schwartz is unlikely to be challenged, because of the references to Le Figaro and La recherche, but if it is, please let me know on my talk page..  DGG ( talk ) 16:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Biorebus
I have followed DGG's example with your new version of this article and redirected it to Laurent Schwartz (oncologist), because I share DGG's view that it does not meet our notability standard, which requires showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If your re-creation of the article means that you disagree with this approach, let me know below here (I will watch this page) and I will restore the article and nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which will start the debate to which DGG referred, lasting seven days, to get the opinion of the wider Wikipedia community. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * what I meant to say by "unprofitable" was that, first, the chances of keeping the article are   approximately zero & second, that notice obtained from the debate may quite possibly   be different from  what you might hope for. The   advice I can give you that is most in your own interests  is to let the matter rest as it is.     DGG ( talk ) 01:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Laurent Schwartz (oncologist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurent Schwartz (oncologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laurent Schwartz (oncologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Laurent Schwartz (oncologist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurent Schwartz (oncologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laurent Schwartz (oncologist)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 11:27, 4 September 2017 (UTC)