User talk:Ludopharma

Welcome!

Hello, Ludopharma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ludo pharma, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Ludo pharma


A tag has been placed on Ludo pharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. Mifter (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I must be very cynical. I couldn't see myself dealing with a company once and then rushing home to write an article about them. And managing to find so much about them, including the logo. The page was deleted because the article failed to show how the company was notable, not because of who you are or are not. I notice the article does not say how many branches the company operates - if any. Peridon (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm likewise skeptical. I don't see any references to this company on the Web other than the now-deleted Wikipedia article and social media promotional pages. The company website linked in the deleted article leads nowhere. Founded in 2011 by students, already a major success, and preparing an IPO, according to the article -- and there's not a single reference to it to be found on the web? It is, indeed, a nice logo. --jpgordon:==( o ) 21:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, so we clearly do not believe in your lack of involvement with this company, and the article is not in any case going to be restored. If you are unblocked under a new user name you will not be allowed to write about Ludo Pharma. That being so, do you still want to be unblocked? What else do you want to write about? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:52, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Almost all of the info i placed on the wiki page i got from a brochure i got in the pharmacie (as they have an whole new concept every new customer gets an information brochure.) I didn't post references because i couldn't find how, so i just posted a link to their site where there is a pdf version of the brochure along with some ohter information, but like you said apparently the site went down. The compayny is notable because they operate ah whole new system of pharmacie healtcare, much more like when you go to a doctor an have a private audience, you no longer get a store. I don't plan to make any new wiki articles in the near future, it is much more bureaucratic than i thought. Sincere regards, Bert.
 * It has to be 'bureaucratic'. Otherwise we'd have every Viagra seller from the internet here. I don't know about over there, but here in the UK you can have a private consultation with the dispenser at every pharmacy I know - even ones like instore at Tesco's. The company is not notable in Wikipedia terms because there is no evidence of independent coverage. In reliable sources. We can't just take your word. Anyway, if you do decide to make a new article, let me know here - I've got this page on watch. There's no great problem about you changing name so long as you don't re-create this article. Peridon (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)