User talk:Luffy487

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! feydey 14:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Advice on uploading images
Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.


 * Pick an image name.
 * When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.


 * Source the image.
 * On the image description page, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so.  If it's from the web, give a URL.  If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.


 * Provide copyright and license information.
 * This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.
 * If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like Photoshop or GIMP, then you own the copyright. To upload it to Wikipedia, you must agree to license it under the GFDL (which allows anyone to use it, but requires that they give credit to the original author and requires that any further edit to the image be licensed under the GFDL as well) or release it into the public domain (which allows anyone to use it for any purpose without restriction.)  Do this by placing an appropriate tag on the image description page, like &#123;{GFDL}} or &#123;{PD-self}}.  Be sure to mention that you created the image.  If you're using &#123;{PD-self}}, you may also want to use &#123;{NoRightsReserved}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.
 * If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another tag that describes the copyright status of the image. Images used on Wikipedia need to be free for our use and the use of sites which reproduce our content.  This means that images cannot have a restriction such as "only for use by Wikipedia", or "for non-commercial use only", or "for educational use".  Images without a free license may be usable in certain articles under fair use, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.


 * Describe the image.
 * To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page.  Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Copyrights, Copyright tags, Fair use, Image description page, Public domain, Images for deletion, Possibly unfree images, Copyright problems, Uploading images

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. feydey 14:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ocean_conveyor_belt.jpg listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Ocean_conveyor_belt.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Copyright problems with Image:2932.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:2932.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Balloonguy 23:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Balloonguy 23:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Le machine.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Le machine.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Brancaturbine.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brancaturbine.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 08:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Flour mill.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Flour mill.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Moulding-Mill.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Moulding-Mill.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 11:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:001manuale.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:001manuale.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Theater of Instruments and Machines.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Theater of Instruments and Machines.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Suggestions
I notice that you joined WikiProject Abandoned Articles, and said there If I could be of any help, I would gladly accept it. While I'm not quite sure what that meant, if you're looking to help the WikiProject, the best thing to do would be to sign up for and work on a block of articles in Section 2.

Also, if you want to test something or work on a draft of an article, one option is to user a subpage rather than doing that directly on your user talk page, which generally should be used exclusively for converations with other editors. -- John Broughton | (♫♫) 14:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:2932.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2932.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Burns.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Burns.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, you might like to look at the changes I made to Green-winged Pytilia to bring the format in line with other bird articles, jimfbleak 08:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Authors

 * Sousa = Jose Augusto de Sousa (1836-1889) Portuguese ornithologist
 * Antinori = Orazio Antinori (1811-1882) Italian zoologist
 * Robert B. Payne born 1938 American ornithologist

Hope that helps. Smallweed 09:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Luffy487 09:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Lynes = Hubert Lynes
 * Neave = Sheffield Airey Neave (1879-1961), Naturalist, entomologist, Secretary of the Zoological Society of London

Smallweed 09:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Aleutian (band)}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at :, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --  Merope  08:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Bird-stub
Hi, you created a lot of birds article lately, and most of them are stub only (info taken from Birdlife website). Any other info/references you can add on articles you started ? quality over quantity. Cheers --Stavenn 04:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, a lot of books for Estrildid/finches (Amazon :)), also Birds of New Guinea, Indonesia, Southeast Asia, Africa and other regions where the finches found. For websites, I don't really know ... sorry (google it ... but mostly you'll find personal breeder page). Anyway, happy wiki. --Stavenn 04:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Payne.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Payne.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Caves of Mars Project
Unfortunately, I do not have enough expertise in planetary science to do much on Caves of Mars Project. However, you may want to try User:Lunokhod. His/her expertise is on the Moon, but he/she may be better able to address Mars-related issues. Thank you, Dr. Submillimeter 10:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * you might want to post to the WP:MARS, or just add a see also link to the main Mars page. I'm trying to concentrate on the Moon here, but if I get some spare time, I'll take a look at it. Lunokhod 13:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Solitary Tinamou Tinamus solitarius.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Solitary Tinamou Tinamus solitarius.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

An update on WikiProject Abandoned Articles
The project has reached the quarter-way point for the work on the list of the oldest 1000 ("abandoned") articles in Wikipedia: 250 articles have been reviewed and updated!

The project now has 21 members. If you're no longer interested, please take your name off the list; you won't get any further messages like this one. On the other hand, if you're still interested, please consider signing up for a(nother) block of 10 articles to work on - if everyone did this, we'd be almost halfway through those 1000 articles!

Finally, please note that project approach has changed slightly - there is now a section for editors to place articles that need to be "adopted", or to adopt articles that need further work. This means that if you find an article in a block of ten that needs more work than you have time for, it has a place to be put.

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Practical joke on your user page
I strongly recommend removing this. I think this sort of thing is in the process of being specifically prohibited, because many editors - myself included - feel that it violates WP:BITE (an essay, admittedly) and, more generally, the purpose of Wikipedia, to build an encyclopedia. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note on my page, and for acting on this. You'll find a discussion is at Wikipedia talk:User page, for what it's worth, and WP:USER has been changed, though it's a bit too cryptic for my likings. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by John Broughton (talk • contribs) 17:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

Lillo & Ingouf
It's Miguel Lillo (articles on Italian and Spanish wikis). Still looking for Ingouf. Smallweed 20:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Quenisset.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Quenisset.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 09:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks to your efforts…
Zebra Waxbill now has the second-highest number of categories, right between Winston Churchill and French language. And I'm sure if this could be calculated, it would probably have the highest ratio of categories to article length. I don't know whether to congratulate or spite you for this achievement, but I'll give a heads-up and say that I wouldn't count on all those categories staying there indefinitely. That said, it's also possible that others will follow you and do the same for other zoology articles, which would be great, I suppose. — Lenoxus 06:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, sorry, no sarcasm intended, I mean it. I just though it was interesting that this article had an unusual number of categories, and my brain is addled enough from sleep deprivation that I was trying to follow the most diplomatic path, not too extreme one way or another, in semi-jocularly pointing this out. As for deleting categories, they all seem accurate, so I'll certainly leave them untouched. I don't know why I said that others would delete them… I guess I meant to warn of every conceivable possibilty, but that still wasn't called for, and I'm sorry. — Lenoxus 07:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Bald Eagle
Go on, be a devil and nominate..you know you want to. (seriously, as the project has started it is great to nominate a few ideas. You never know. I find sometimes an article is really easy where as others juts don't gel right at all (at least I have had this experience in dino articles as collaborator there.) cheers, Casliber | talk  |  contribs 09:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Aww, that's a great quote to go on an article page. I'm thinking to get folks started one that is either really popular or almost there is a better bet, but try to get it on the page :) cheers, Casliber | talk  |  contribs 07:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * ...actually the article isn't in bad shape at all on a closer look. If you go over it a few times then put it in for Peer Review it may be easier than you think to get to FA...cheers, Casliber | talk  |  contribs 08:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Debate at Category talk:Biota by country
I am going to hold off on future nominations while the discussion at Category talk:Biota by country continues. If the general consensus is to keep categorization by country, then I will acquiese to the consensus. However, I have the impression that these discussions have become too bogged down in the past and have never led to any action. I also have the sincere impression that KP Botany is more interested in simply arguing rather than trying to improve the categorization system. I hope my interactions with you will be smoother, even if we do disagree. Dr. Submillimeter 09:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I am withdrawing from this discussion and all work on these "fauna by country" categories. It is not worth my time to repeatedly answer KP Botany's questions when he/she will simply ignore me and then complain that his/her questions are not being answered.  Dr. Submillimeter 11:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for continuing the discussion on this subject anyway. Let me know if anything develops. If you want, I can provide you with some draft nominations for Central America, South America, and Africa (split into North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa). Dr. Submillimeter 15:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

African birds
The list I used is the Avibase Clements list, but there's conflicting taxonomy all over Wikipedia anyway, so just go ahead and we can sort out problems as they arise. There is also a list of African birds,

Basically, I write articles for birds I have seen on my annual holidays, plus a few easy ones (eg, it seemed a pity not to do Lesser Striped Swallow when it's so similar to Greater Striped Swallow.

Deciding on taxonomy could be an issue. For example, for the swallows I'm using Sinclair, Hockey and Warburton, SASOL Birds of Southern Africa which splits like mad, and Turner and Rose, Swallows and Martins, which takes a more measured line. I've tended to be pragmatic and consider for example whether any of the other subspecies of Black Rough-winged Swallow (in prep) would get articles written if I went with SASOL and split the migratory SA race.

I don't know if these ramblings make any sense, jimfbleak 13:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The SASOL guide is just the more recent edition of your Sinclair, Hockey and Warburton book, it will be interesting to see what changes in taxonomy they introduced between the editions. jimfbleak 06:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've seen the Pica book on Lonchura, but I already spend too much on bird books. I notice that Sinclair et al sometimes use different names from those in use further north such as Yellow-billed Egret instead of Intermediate Egret. jimfbleak 08:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Edits to the Great albatross page
Just so you know, the Shy Albatross (not Sky, btw) is a mollymawk, not a great albatross. Sabine's Sunbird talk 08:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The great albatrosses have white backs, mollymawks have dark backs (though I've never heard the group called that before.) Anyway, the splitting of the albatrosses from 2 genera into 4 happened in 1996, three years after your book was published. While there is endless debate as to how many species of albatross there are (check out the albatross article and the associated peer review and FAC) the split into 4 genera received widespread acceptance. The shy albatross was Diomedea but got moved to Thalassarche, and the great albatrosses were kept in Diomedea. Might I respectfully suggest a certain amount of caution in changing taxonomies based on a 14 year old book? Where we deviate from HBW in taxonomy it is usually on the basis of recent research. Sabine's Sunbird talk 09:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You certainly didn't vandalise the article. I just left the message to explain why I reverted your edits. Taxonomy is tricky, and with the albatrosses I thrashed out a compromise with SP-KP as to how the list goes; so when I revert changes made to it I try and explain why. I notice, BTW, that you're working on a list of Southern African birds, good luck with that! I've been working on my List of Fijian birds since September (on and off). Its a smaller list but with all the different islands it takes time. Sabine's Sunbird talk 11:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific. Its got tables in the back that help with the distribution, though I have to read the rest of the book for the other info. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 19:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Francolin
the current listings of francolin and spurfow genera are in accordance with Madge and McGowan,Pheasants, Partridges and Grouse ISBN 0-7136-3966-0. However, they also list subgenera of Francolinus, one of which is Pternistes, so I suspect that someone has decided that this should be a full genus. I can't keep up with changes in taxonomy. jimfbleak 14:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Birds of Africa
Laysan Albatross? Even if the wretched things 'somehow' ever got there, shouldn't bird of cats be for native and migrant birds rather than once a lifetime miracle vagrants? Sabine's Sunbird talk 09:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Hooded Munia authors
Fairly sure it's Jared Diamond, B. Jonkers and H. Roersma, and Brian J. Coates. Subspecies authors are a lot more tricky to find. Smallweed 10:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Phoenicopterus
It's in a state of flux at present. If you count the Caribbean Flamingo as a subspecies of Greater Flamingo, Phoenicopterus ruber, the New World bird is P. r. ruber, and the Old World subspecies is P. r. roseus. However, some authorities, I think including the AOU (haven't checked), split the Caribbean nominate form as a full species, Phoenicopterus ruber, leaving the Old World species as Phoenicopterus roseus. jimfbleak 15:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think you can put both, since the NAm form wouldn't occur in SA, it's more a matter of deciding whether to split, in which case the SA bird is Phoenicopterus roseus, or lump, as Phoenicopterus ruber roseus. jimfbleak 17:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That would be consistent with SASOL, jimfbleak 18:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Java-based Instant Messenger One
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Java-based Instant Messenger One, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Java-based Instant Messenger One fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: not encyclopedia content, generally irrelevant web content To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Java-based Instant Messenger One, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Java-based Instant Messenger One itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Liazzat Bonat
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Liazzat Bonat, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Liazzat Bonat seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Liazzat Bonat, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Bird collaboration of the month
As a member of WP:BIRD you are invited to this month's collaboration

Shyamal 02:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
The WikiProject welcomes two new members in the past three months:
 * Java7837
 * Nearly Human

Progress
The WikiProject is now halfway done, numerically, with the 1000 articles identified in December 2006. The first (oldest) 500 articles have been claimed, reviewed, and (when needed, which was almost all cases) improved. Moreover, given the passage of time, many of articles 501 through 1000 have been worked on by other editors (it's ten months since that list was generated). So reviewing the second half of the 1000 articles should be easier.

A slightly different approach
Section 6 (articles 501 through 600 on the list) has been organized differently than the previous five sections. First, blocks are (roughly) five articles each, rather than 10, making it easier for you to claim and finish a block. Second, perhaps more importantly, each block consists of similar pages; if you're interested in fixing disambiguation pages, there are blocks of those; if you're interested in articles (which is what the project originally started out being), there are blocks of those; and there is one block of lists and one of redirects (mostly redirects to articles). So, fewer surprises this time when you claim a block.

In addition, since the project now has 25 active members (though some are likely inactive), having more blocks will make it easier to spread the editing around.

Inactivating your membership
If you received this newsletter on your user talk page and don't want to receive such postings in the future, please move your name, in the participants section of the WikiProject, to the "Inactive" subsection.

About this newsletter
This newsletter is being delivered by Anibot; it was written by John Broughton. Please post any comments about it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abandoned Articles, in a section separate from the newsletter itself. Delivered by Anibot 00:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Birds of Timor-Leste
Category:Birds of Timor-Leste, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory (talk) 12:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProjet Birds May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds June 2008 Newsletter
The June 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008 Birds Project Newsletter Link
The July 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. --Addbot (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds August newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 01:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds October newsletter
The October 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds November newsletter
The July 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds February newsletter
The February 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 22:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds March newsletter
The March 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds April newsletter
The April 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 15:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds May newsletter
The May 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  06:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds June newsletter
The June 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  13:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds August newsletter
The August 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
 * Newsletter delivery by –xeno talk 02:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Birds of Angola has been nominated for discussion
Category:Birds of Angola, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 06:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Birds of Egypt has been nominated for discussion
Category:Birds of Egypt, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 21:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Birds of São Tomé and Príncipe has been nominated for discussion
Category:Birds of São Tomé and Príncipe, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 19:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)