User talk:Lugia2453/Archive 3

Sex 3.0
Hey, so I fleshed out the Sex 3.0 page but the page needs forking into two pages here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_3.0

and here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_3.0:_A_Sexual_Revolution_Manual

As Sex 3.0 (the open source sexual revolution movement) and Sex 3.0 (the book) are two different things.

Right now this page :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_3.0

Forwards to this page :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_3.0:_A_Sexual_Revolution_Manual

Can you help forking the two pages? I don't know how to do it myself.

The current page which I have been editing is the text about Sex 3.0 as a movement (along with an explanation of what Sex 3.0 means)

The text for the wiki page just about the book is as follows :

2011 novel by J J Roberts. It defines the three sexual eras of mankind as Sex 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0; with 1.0 being all of human history up until 8,000 BC, 2.0 being 8,000 BC up to and including the present day and 3.0 being the present day forwards. According to the author, mankind is currently in the Sex 2.0 era, which has failed us because our lifestyles have caused problems in our modern day sexual relationships. He believes that we need to move on to Sex 3.0, which is "a world of mutual understanding between men and women and a return to nature. " above commentsby User:PizzaLord.


 * Just following up on this; I have speedy deleted Sex 3.0 as promotion, and listed the article on the book for AfD.  DGG( talk ) 04:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

You reverted my edits on Haiti
I added some text to the article on Haiti that said Haiti was the shittiest country on earth and I called the Haitian people lazy, you reverted my edit.

Why did you revert my edit?

216.149.187.98 (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)


 * (talk page stalker) Your comment should speak for itself. What sort of question is that? Frigid Ninja  00:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Page
I had blanked a page that I created a few years ago for a charity that is no longer performing it's mission and is no longer a registered charity. You reverted the changes. I edited the page again, please consider the deletion. Special Kindness In Packages, Inc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sspoerke (talk •contribs) 23:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm not creating vandalism
You're damaging the english language by allowing a Neologist, incorrect term appear on a popular website when a more correct term already exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt606 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Submission
Can you review this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Michael_Williams_(American_football) I added a few things to it. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 02:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

It wasn't me!
Whatever you said I did, it wasn't me. I've never been on the page you refer to before! 78.147.48.156(talk) 19:34, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Another Submission
I can you review this article here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Rodney_Smith_(American_football) I added some more information to the article. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Article
Can you also take a look at this one also. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dwayne_Beckford I added a couple of citations to it. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 23:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toscano (cigar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferdinand III (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Article
I have a article here for review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Damion_Square and I don't know what the Template loop detected: Template:AFC submission means. I tried to remove from there but I just didn't know what it was for.173.78.231.251 (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Please leave it up
The thing about Dr. Parry Graham is something that pertains to our school, and it is not spam. Please stop taking it down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpg2016 (talk •contribs) 22:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Tavakoli
I've moved Tavakoli's comment to her talk page. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Lewis Housden
Based upon this diff and my initial WP:BEFORE of the person which netted a facebook page and a twitter page. I give it a chance if I find a seemingly possibility of there being an assertion of notability but my findings were strong evidence to the contrary. Mkdw talk 22:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, I took this editors history at techno bass into consideration too when I first visited the talk page. Mkdw talk 22:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Article
I got another article for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Travis_Long I thought it was good I put the sources that I can find but I guess it was something else. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 00:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Wow
Thanks again. --bonadea contributions talk 22:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards thesandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.  kashmiri 09:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Edits
hello. why do you take my editing away? — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 86.3.95.106 (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * They're not helpful or constructive. Do you really think something like "I have have flown to many different planets are you jealous is that you removed my last post, i am a buddhist sorcerer!" adds anything to a page about an Indian fragrance? It's not even on-topic.Lugia2453 (talk) 21:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

You reverted my comments on South Hiendley, if you lived there you would understand how constructive they were.
why?

Dragonball Evolution edit
My entire point for criticism at the "Dragonball Evolution's" first paragraph was to point out those unaware of the Dragonball franchise that this movie was an inaccurate work, and that blame shouldn't be directed towards the original manga itself. It being constructive is besides the point; an actual fact that needed to be expressed was that the movie is nothing compared or related to the manga and anime. So, this is a command to you to immediately reset that edit; this edit will be restored to the expression that I previously rendered. It's a definite fact you will restore my written thoughts, so don't bother resisting this order. Hurry up, sonny...don't keep the internet waiting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by87.164.190.84 (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * What you put in the article was the kind of comment that should be posted on the article's talk page and not on the article itself. If you want to make the comment, do it on the talk page. Also, you should sign your messages, which was automatically done by a bot because you didn't do so. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Reverted Edit On Rebecca Lowe
You appear to be acting as judge and jury on edits added to Rebecca Lowes profile - edits which are all truthful. I'm instructing you to stop. You don't know the bitch and she has not ruined multiple relationships in your life. If the bitch wants publicity, she'll get the negative as well as the positive. Do not edit the posts without justification.

If you want to do some proper research, then add that Paul Buckle left his loyal wife and 2 children for her, that she has never been faithful in a relationship, that she lied about her age to get her first job, that she had no active interest in football until encouraged to join in the sport by an ex (guess who that is), that she has clear behavioral issues caused by her fathers unfaithfulness as a child, and thats just for starters. If you want to be all empowering, then do your research correctly and stop editing out the truth.

Why. I'm not vandalizing
Seriously, I do not believe my edits are constituting vandalism. Please respond to this matter

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Vidushisaraf (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC) Because this page hasn't been created for the purpose of advertisement. This is for an event which is being done by a Management institute iLEAD, kolkata (http://www.ilead.net.in/ Link for the institute) which is holding an event by the name Take the lead. There are other such events which are done by other management institutes listed under wikipedia. So i request you the please do not remove my article as every institute had the same rights.

Few events of other institute listed under wikipedia : Intaglio (Business School Summit) Confluence_(IIM_Ahmedabad) Revels (culfest) — Preceding unsigned comment added byVidushisaraf (talk • contribs) 18:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Port Talbot
As you were restoring the Peter Bush material, I was adding to / continuing an existing discussion at WP:EAR,here. I'm not sure I agree with your conclusion, but do want to make sure you know of the discussion so you can weigh in. I am not trying an end run! JohnInDC (talk) 21:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Article
Hi Luigi,

Many thanks for agreeing with my comments on the notablity of Peter Bush for the town of Port Talbot, the other admin? has now created a community forum on it, I believe I have sourced enough non biased credable websites with referencing to show that he is indeed notable within Port Talbot and in fact within the UK, within his profession and professional memberships of institutions and is considered a leading person (why else would he be awarded an Honorary Doctorate) and also receive so many national awards (UK Based)as well as regional and local ones. Also being a Fellow of an Institute clearly shows incredible dedication and expertise in that field.

I think I should make an article which showcases him better and proves his notability although I was happy with him just being mentioned in the Port Talbot section. How would I go about making an article, although would have to get in touch with Peter first.

Many Thanks for your supportIttfellow (talk) 21:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I would suggest making an article and submitting it to Articles for creation after you're done with it. I suggest Articles for creation because you can have experienced editors look at it and see if he's notable enough for an article. Also, please call me Lugia, not Luigi, since my username is Lugia2453. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Szekely land does not contain any valid references.
Hello Lugia. I modified that page as it does not present any correct references. All the information there is extracted from hungarian-biased sources and there is no reliable reference. This article is not objective at all and I can't believe it got published on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by86.97.81.44 (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Replacing it with "KURTOS KALACS" isn't the way to go about doing that. It's vandalism, which is why I kept reverting it. Just remove the content and explain why you did it in your edit summary. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree, but nevertheless, as you verify what I am posting, you should verify the references. I will try to edit the article tomorrow but it is really disappointing that anyone can post these things here. The subject in question is strongly debated and citing references only from one side of a debate is biasing and misleading. (86.97.81.44 (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC))

The proper information was being provided by my majestic person
Can you at least inform me the reason why you injustly reverted my proper and most necessary adiitions? stop acting like a tyrant and butcher the proper person, you are incurring in an abuse of editing power and your inmoral actions move against the titanic right of freedom of speech and worldwide participation.

I move to execute all proper actions in order to remove this heathen person that opresses informative contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.35.79.55(talk) 21:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

So sorry.
My thirteen year old son got on my still logged-in account, and began vandalizing things, He's grounded, and I'll be more careful with my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HaydenJAllen(talk • contribs) 22:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey
You´re right brother, that was unconstructive, I thank you for your timely edits. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Salsudoikari (talk •contribs) 22:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

But you still agree
But you still agree that Natalie Morales is Hot and that Al and Matt and are two awesome dudes right? OceanBlue13 (talk) 21:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Did not Vandalize Hoda page
Hoda is from Egypt. Her parents are Egyptian.OceanBlue13 (talk) 21:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Unconstructive Edits to Filipino American
As this is a Hughes Net Satellite Internet connection, it is unfortunately a Broadly Shared IP, meaning that its users are distributed randomly throughout the globe. I have no idea who made the unconstructive edit to the Filipino American article, but I sincerely hope she or he will refrain from such activities in the future. I will do my best to revert any unconstructive edits as soon as they appear. I will glad to be of assistance in this regard. If this IP appears to make many unconstructive edits in the future please consider that there are thousands of users who would be unduly adversely affected by a restriction in editing privileges or other punitive measure. Thank you for your consideration.

sorry i "vandalised" but i dont know how to make a new page for it.
you removed the part about the sixth grader i know why but i didnt know how to make a new page for it sorry LUGGIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by69.157.54.166 (talk) 21:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Make a new article at Articles for creation and submit it there. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Article
Can you review this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Damion_Square173.78.231.251 (talk) 05:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Another Article
Can you look this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ja%27Gared_Davis173.78.231.251 (talk) 00:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

taking down all my stuff
why are you taking down all of my edits? I'm just trying to contribute to the site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.78.70.124 (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 22:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Another Submission
Can look at this article here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Quanterus_Smith173.78.231.251 (talk) 03:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Resubmission
Hello Lugia2453. I modified my page and fell it in with many references, but only in Latvian language. In Latvia there are no sport web sites in english. Hope now you will accept my article: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deniss Petrovs

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksandra lv(talk • contribs) 22:59, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Submission Declined
Hi,

we created a page about HOPE'87, a charity and NGO working in the field of development and humanitarian aid...the article was rejected on Mar, 19th by you, because it was not supported by reliable sources/we didn't cite sources. But the thing is that we - the ones who wrote the article - are the NGO itself...isn't a link to our website enough of a source?? What other sources can we add??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/HOPE%2787

--HOPE87 (talk) 16:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)HOPE87

Updates to SearchHub wiki submission
Hi,

Thanks for reviewing my page.

I have read the "guidelines on the notability of websites" and the "golden rule"

As a consequence I have added citations to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject. Please see the first line "SearchHub is an open source search community site dedicated to supporting the Apache Lucene and Apache Solr communities launched on November 12, 2012.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]"

You also comment that "the majority of the given sources come from the subject itself" - Are the additional 5 citations above sufficient?

Thanks

Lewis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewisfarrell(talk • contribs) 17:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, it was only a very minor piece of information, don't really see how it wasn't constructive but wasn't a hugely important piece of information either. Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impact33(talk • contribs) 22:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey buddy I don't want any trouble. Can you please leave my page alone man, there is no vandalism on it and I added the signifigance of the page. Please don't mess with it, and like ReNock on facebook. — Precedingunsignedcomment added by Mr.mseda (talk •contribs) 23:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. See CSD A7. If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page, and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message, explaining why you believe this article should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message.

Note that once tagged with this notice, the page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient. Note to administrators: this article has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion.

This page was last edited by Lugia2453 (contribs | logs) at 23:24 UTC (2 minutes ago) Please consider placing the template: ==Speedy deletion nomination of ReNock9==

A tag has been placed on ReNock9 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mr.mseda (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC) on the talk page of the author.

BMW F800GT article
Dear Lugia2453,

Thank you for publishing my first ever Wikipedia article so quickly! Less than 24 hours!

Kind regards --Duffs10 (talk) 01:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Take a look at 71.58.201.168's talk page
Hello! I noticed that you rolled an edit back by 71.58.201.168. You may want to take a look at what he/she changed your username to (LugiaLicksHerpes).... this person should be blocked for a while (they were just recently blocked, but still continue to make obnoxious, unconstructive edits). I've been monitoring them for a bit now, they're a large nuisance to Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions! Endofskull (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

IP Edits to Systems development life-cycle
The IP has made edits by placing more of his 'helpful tips' in the article, rather than on the talk page as I instructed him to do on my talk page. Just wanted to get a second opinion and see what you think should be done before I reverted them again. Thanks,Oddbodz (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps move the tips to the talk page off of the article, and message the IP about writing tips like these in the article's talk page. Don't just give the IP some generic warning about vandalism or whatever, because that's not what it is. Generic warnings aren't always the way to go in situations like this. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have moved the users comments, informed him of this and cancelled the template warnings on his talk page now I am aware they were good faith edits. Oddbodz (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello Fellow Legendary Pokemon....... that is all, Thank You. Giggity! — Precedingunsigned comment added by 76.230.86.122 (talk) 22:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/SiConnect
Hi there,

I've added loads of external references to the candidate SiConnect article (Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/SiConnect), plus I've fleshed out the content generally. Hopefully the notability is now obvious. Could you have another look at it ?

Many thanks ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siconnect(talk • contribs) 09:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Endofskull (talk) 22:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

lol
When I was in high school I could never edit because the IP was blocked all the time, because people would blank articles and replace them with ASCII genitalia and the like.

Thought that would change when I got to college. Apparently not.

On behalf of everyone here who isn't a gigantic turd - sorry.

74.115.237.156 (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Fwhy would you do this. You give me last warning. I simply change word wing to a synonym of it, appendage. This not right. Why you do dis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanSeneca (talk • contribs) 22:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Deleting
I thought the page was blank. — Preceding unsigned comment added bySergeantHippyZombie (talk •contribs) 00:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

User Gacorno
Hello,

You seem to have been moving a lot of the pages that User Gacorno has been making... just wondering, why have you not deleted the pages and (potentially) blocked the user, as it appears that all of these pages are autobiographical (given the user's name), that the user has created many pages with the same title, and that the user is creating the pages after they have been speedily deleted, but under a different name (seeUser talk:Gacorno).

Thanks,

ModelUN (talk) 00:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin, so I can't delete pages and block users. Also, I've only moved one of the user's pages to different titles, because the title doesn't need to be in all caps. Secondly, why block this user? The article the user created seems fine to me, so a block just seems unfair. I realize the user has created other articles on the same person, but is it really fair to block the user? The article had a good amount of sources before, so there's no reason to delete it, and especially no reason to block the user. Can't we do something other than a block - you know, try and discuss this with the user? Lugia2453 (talk) 00:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit is not as informative
Hello, thank you for your nice message. The phrase "metabolize metals" is really more informative than "use", for those unfamiliar or confused with "Mistborn metal powers, and Allomancy". — Precedingunsigned comment added by 74.4.139.44 (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

XKCD Challenge
No worries about reverting changes, just playing the XKCD challenge for today. http://xkcd.com/1193/

Thanks for the good work you do! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.219.50.2 (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Article
I added some info and a reference to support the information. I hope this helps while I'm continuing to find more references to this article meantime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Damion_Square173.78.231.251 (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

sorry
YES MA'AM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcmudoscu8d8d8o (talk • contribs) 23:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Samantha Hunt
Hello, I added more references to my article on writer Samantha Hunt. Can you review it please. Thanks, Liz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Samantha_Hunt — Precedingunsigned comment added by LizYounger (talk •contribs) 01:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for permanent block
Hello, You recently reverted a change from this IP address. This is the IP address of an Australian high school - It is highly unlikely that any constructive or useful posts or updates will be made by users from this IP. I have asked previously about permanently blocking on the Admin's page, but this was ignored. Can you please help me bring this to the attention of a Wikipedia Admin?

203.82.100.214 (talk) 06:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Went ahead and appended 86.140.65.127 on AIV
Hello, I just wanted to inform you that with 86.140.65.127 I proceeded with the action of reporting them toWP:AIV. It seems that they only want to make malicious, spammy edits (as they did ~12 times) on pages. Would you agree with this motion? (I'm new to Wikipedia; any criticism is greatly appreciated. You seem to be very well-versed with Wikipedia) Thanks! ChaseAm(talk) 00:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

External Links added to Selling Techniques
Thank you for reaching out to me about your action. I do appreciate your watching Wikipedia. I honestly thought I was following the guidelines very carefully when I added the links. Most Wikipedia articles do have external links. The guidelines say it is appropriate when they offer additional information that is not included in the article. These links are all to research based articles by an expert in the field. The links all include critical information about selling which is not currently in the Wikipedia article. Yes, the Wikipedia article does need to be re-written and points added. I fully intend to do that. Until I have the time to write those, I felt that at least letting readers know there was additional information on this topic would be helpful. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Donshapiro (talk • contribs) 01:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

KSEVT article, low?
Hello! Thank you for your review and approval of the article on KSEVT. I was just wondering, how come that the article got a "LOW" mark in importance, when it is perfectly clear that it is an ambitious international project, though in a specific field of science and art, but nonetheless. That is my only bigger remark for now. Thank you! --Vladotepesh (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Spandex external link, Stretch fabric reference
Is possibile link reference to comercial site? Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stretch_fabric Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by37.116.163.215 (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Alice Eagly
I know at the time it wasn't labeled as such, but the Alice Eagly article is a course assignment. You deleted a lot of User talk:Adoyle6's work. Please let the student complete work on this article before making huge changes like that. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 18:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Gary Lynn Comstock, verifiable content question
Dear Lugia2453, Thank you for reviewing my submission for a page on "Gary Lynn Comstock." You did not approve it because it needs to have sources that are verifiable. Can you please tell me how to fix this problem? As best as I can tell, all of the references listed are publicly accessible, peer reviewed, and easily verified. I've read the Wikipedia guidelines for "verifiable content" and, again, checked to ensure that everything on that page meets the guidelines. I'd appreciate any assistance you can give me. Thank you. Tomhregan (talk) 19:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Edits on Regi's page
You reverted my edit on Regi's page, but somehow didn't notice the tons of other edits, changing his picture into a gorilla, for one o.O

Double reversions
I will stop watching Geoff8700. We have twice done simultaneous reverts on vandalism from that account and it is messy. I will leave this one to you. Mtpaley (talk) 21:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Hoaxes
I have some real concerns about your judgement in regards to removing speedy delete templates. Here you removed a hoax speedy deletion tag with the message "doesn't appear to be a hoax". The article claims the subject has appeared in commercials, tabloids, and television programs. However, the only web presence Leonardo von Morenberg seems to have is a blog started on April 1st and this entry on Wikipedia. For someone who has appeared in tabloids and on television you would think that there would be some mention of this person, yet there is none. There isn't a Facebook profile, and there are zero mentions anywhere in the news. It is claimed that von Morenberg has a LinkedIn profile, but either it was entered incorrectly or the moderators at LinkedIn have already deleted it because it is clearly a hoax.Here you removed a speedy delete hoax tag from Vicaso Group with the message "A hoax, really? It has its own website and logo, for Pete's sake!" I'm sure you know that there are any number of software programs that can be used to create logos in a matter of minutes. As for the website, it was created onApril 5. It's less than 48 hours old. There are a number of awards listed on both pages. One from Bizmonth Review, the only web presence of this review appears to be these two articles. In fact the only mention of any of these awards with the organizations that supposedly awarded them are from these two articles and the Vicaso Group website that is only two days old. So I am curious, what in the world lead you to believe that these are not hoaxes? It seems to me that anyone who gives these more than a cursory glance can see that they are hoaxes, so I'm wondering what you saw that made you confident enough to remove two speedy deletion tags. AniMate 05:31, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Both have been nominated for deletion, and I'd appreciate you chiming in at Articles for deletion/Vicaso Group andArticles for deletion/Leonardo von Morenberg. AniMate 05:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I have speedy-deleted them - undoubted hoaxes, with absolutely no independent confirmation, which we should not allow to linger. You wrote "it has its own website and logo", but those are very easy to make; and the website does not look like that of a 12-year-old, $1 bn dollar company. It was only registered on 5 April, and is remarkably short on detail - only three pages, a lot of "coming soon", and (a classic sign of a hoax) no checkable postal address or telephone number. We get these all the time - here is another belonging tothis "15-year-old mega-millionnaire" from last month. Regards, JohnCD(talk) 11:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

my article deleted
what to do now and get my article back.

Tigres de la UANL
Why did you accepted this unsourced and biased edit? Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Lashenden Air Warfare Museum
Interested to no why you thought this didnt meet the criteria for A3, the one sentence article text was a rephrase of the title and an external link - A3 says a rephrasing of the title, external links and category tags, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I take the criteria to mean just reposting the title without any more information. This article has information about where it's located, so it has some content. I don't think this article should be deleted - what it really needs is expansion and sources. It's a perfectly good stub, so why delete it? Lugia2453 (talk) 20:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * OK no problem I can see where you are coming from, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Rhinophyma
Your bot deleted my posts on this page - I thought it was a person - please fix. I am suffering from Rhinophyma and found this treatment is a cheap and viable alternative to regular/laser sugery and my dermatologist agrees. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.219.20.25 (talk) 22:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Unnecessary revert war
Next time, I think you should just request for an admin to block a vandal IP instead of getting into a revert war with IP198.188.171.234 like you did at PlayStation 4. Constantly reverting the IP like that clutters up the history, which is unnecessary. Since you're a reviewer/rollbacker, I thought you should've known this already. Thanks -M0rphzone (talk) 04:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Sector 06 Rourkela
Hello Friend if you let me work on this new page named Sector 06 Rourkela as I have created it now, Why this page is redirecting toRourkela as it is done by you. Please I'm reverting it to normal state

Thanks Swarupboserkl (talk) 16:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Sector 06 Rourkela
Ok Friend let me give me some more time as I have not collected enough information except it's Template that I have worked on. It will take some more time to put up more information.Swarupboserkl (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Sex2017
Blocked per your report. I can't remember the last time I performed an indefinite VOA block as I did here, since I don't normally see users as irreeemable after just a few edits. However, the username issue and the stuff he was inserting into the article combined to make me doubt that he had any chance. Nyttend (talk) 21:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Thx...
...for keeping an eye on my Talk page ;-) Yinta n²   21:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quentin
I only spoke the truth. Quentin is in grave danger.

Edits
Responding to your edits on the Timeline of United Statesinventions page, that user keeps deleting sourced information which is verifiable which reflects what is already identifical on the aricles Tractor and Airplane.Yoganate79 (talk) 22:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicolas Gilbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Rea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Fructose
I don't understand how saying fructose is a poison and responsible for childhood obesity is destructive. I believe everyone has a right to state the truth and inform people when there is an issue this important. What are you doing - living in your computer 24/7 and deciding who can say what? Give me a break Aprile — Preceding unsigned comment added by74.95.42.29 (talk) 19:50, 13 April 2013 (UTC)


 * wikipedia is not a soap box. I also removed one of your edits to the entry on high fructose corn syrup. If you include citations to reputable sources your edits can stay. If it is such a clear issue for you finding the appropriate references should be no problem.


 * DouglasCalvert (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Friendly fire
Damn, you're fast. One of these days I'll shoot you in the back by accident :) Yintan ²   21:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey
You're reverting vandalism too? Well I'm only doing it because I really don't have anything better to do. Gaz and Gaming Fan (talk) 23:02, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Adam Scott (golfer)
Thanks :) You're right, that should have been removed. Wrong revert after the others who were vandalizing. James of UR(talk) 23:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Referee
Thanks for your help with the rugby referee thing. That was poor judgement on my part. Yintan ²  07:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Marcel Wanders
Hello,

Yes, I can understand why you would have done so, naturally that would have appeared errant at first. I've changed it again, providing a citation to help clear up the confusion. I appreciate your diligence. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 75.73.65.92 (talk) 00:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * It seems this IP thinks he is funny. But that one article he just added doesn't make him a clown. Lugia2453, I appreciate if you would also check the further development here. -- 00:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

scott baio
i think that my information was helpful because i said how old he was when he filmed it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.220.67 (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Tom Rosenthal
Do you know how we can get this temporarily protected? ubiquity (talk) 21:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I requested protection for the article at Requests for page protection. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Please help
Ok you know what I am going to put some valid information in here. In a land of opportunity there was this man — Preceding unsigned comment added by176.250.191.14 (talk • contribs)

Would you like to help with H7N9 bird flu?
Hi,

I'm writing to recent participants at Avian influenza. I think it's important to cover H7N9, without either overstating or understating it. Any time you can spare to help with the research and/or the editing will be most appreciated. Thanks. Cool Nerd (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

User talk:jayanthsugavasi
Hi Madam, i created wiki page for gowri memorial high school with all refernces and links which are approved by minstry of education and state of Andhra pradesh. i don't know why you have declined,it is very important to know history of famous school. i request you to look on these issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayanthsugavasi(talk • contribs) 20:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Hi Mr Lugia, Thanks for your quick reply. i want you to remind the references which are mentioned in article are approved by Govt of india, i request you to check document and news articles are not reliable.we can't display registration certificate and other legal copies, if you feel Indian government reference document are still not reliable. i request you to decline my article. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Jayanthsugavasi (talk •contribs) 21:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * First things first, I'm a sir, not a madam. Secondly, I declined your article because you didn't have enough references to show the notability of the subject. If you can find more secondary, reliable sources such as news articles on your subject, that would be great. It would also be great if you would sign your posts with four tildes. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Buddy Fruits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Safeway


 * Heike Hanold-Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Unknown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Please accept my latest submission. It was made concise by choice. Please respect my decision.
Please accept my latest submission of today and do not revert to the old one. It was made concise and shorter by choice. Please respect this well thought of decision. Best — Preceding unsigned comment added by70.81.101.20 (talk) 23:33, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

AfD on Sex 3.0: A Sexual Revolution Manual
There is currenty a discussion about deleting an article you have significantly edited. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex 3.0: A Sexual Revolution Manual. Lady of  Shalott  11:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lugia
I am sorry if you feel as though my changes are vandalistic but it is an unwritten law of the pupils of the school — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakemadmad (talk • contribs) 21:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

FIFA 13
Why did you undo my edits? They only helped the page and will continue to push until the edits get accepted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.249.88 (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)