User talk:Lugnuts/Archive 15

WP:FILMS June 2010 Newsletter
The June 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:34, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Argentine cinema
Hello your Lugness. I was wondering if you could create some classic Argentina film director templates for me for directors such as Mario Soffici (done), Luis César Amadori etc. You can find the most notable directors in Category:Films by Argentine directors. Its time the articles were connected together and coordinate it I think and also help me dig out the missing articles which were missed when drawing up the lists on the dark ages.....Many of the articles like Dieciséis años are isolated when they are directed by notable directors. Now if only I had these books].... [[User:Dr. Blofeld| Dr. Blofeld  ]]     White cat 10:15, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy to create any missing articles too, meanwhile though I'll fill out some of the stubs. I'd actually forgotten how much fun it is editing film articles. Good thing is that any film posters or screenshots from the old era can be uploaded to the commons! Dr. Blofeld      White cat 12:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Can you remember the name of the film editor who creates lots of film director templates and articles who we guided a while back? Dr. Blofeld       White cat 15:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Ah that's right. I just noticed that both Michael Gothard and Jill Bennett (British actress) who appeared in For Your Eyes Only both committed suicide between 1990-1992. Funnily enough both did seem the gloomy sort in that film. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 11:40, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Silvertone Records (1930)
A tag has been placed on Silvertone Records (1930) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 09:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Silvertone Records (1930)


The article Silvertone Records (1930) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No claim to significance fails WP:CORP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Silvertone Records (1930)
I have nominated Silvertone Records (1930), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Silvertone Records (1930). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 09:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Me thinks somebody is compelled to delete this.... Dr. Blofeld       White cat 11:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nitto Records
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nitto Records, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Assessing films
I did not know before. Thank you! Do you know who decided this and why? –p joe f (talk • contribs) 07:29, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt reply. I will ask there. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 07:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar, Lugnuts! It's my pleasure adding these things, and I'll continue to do so when I've got extra time & want a break from my usual editing areas. Silent film / classic comedy was actually the first area I worked in, before I got tempted over to Japanese erotic cinema-- first to counter the heavy deletion in that area, and then just to expand our coverage of the subject because it's so damned interesting... If that subject ever gets officially banned (or I get tired of it), Silent film & comedy could likely be my next refuge... Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 13:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you again for the heads up and for recognizing others. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 16:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Good to see you reward the pained "Japanese porno dude". He thoroughly deserves it. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 11:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It's tough work, Blofeld, but somebody's got to do it! ;-) Dekkappai (talk) 20:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Tribute to Eric Rohmer
As you have changed to "keep", might you wish to strikethrough your "delete"? Might then be closable per snow, and not confuse. Thanks,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:48, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Suggestion noted.  Lugnuts  (talk) 06:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Georg Wilhelm Pabst
I was trying to give it some order, the only way it seems is to rename the actual article to the original german release title. As it is some are in German and some in English, most of the English titles are just translations as it was never officially released like that. Tstrobaugh (talk) 14:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Ballerina (film)
Please read Help:Interlanguage_links and revert this edit. Thanks.Tstrobaugh (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * same with this one.Tstrobaugh (talk) 20:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Please fix the above edits as requested. Thanks.Tstrobaugh (talk) 14:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there some problem? You seem to be editing but haven't yet fixed these edits. Let me know.Tstrobaugh (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There's nothing to fix.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. On your edit summary you said: " links shouldn't go outside English wikipedia", I provided a link (above) to wikipedia policy that states that you should link to other language wiki's when they have an article that the English wikpedia doesn't. What is the basis of your claim that "There's nothing to fix"? Thanks.Tstrobaugh (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * So basically your argument is that you know better than wikipedia policy and you aren't going to observe it? Just want to get on record that that is your position. Correct me if I'm wrong.Tstrobaugh (talk) 18:32, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Undocumented edit
I see you don't have rollback permissions so I'm confused as to how you did an undocumented edit. You edited here and even though it says you only edited the "infobox" section, my previous edit was deleted. How do you explain this?Tstrobaugh (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * What missing content are you referring to? The Erich Ponto link is still in the article, I don't see any discrepancies. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 21:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see it either. Sometimes intermediate edits can be lost if one (or both) of the two parties edit-conflict with each other and one repairs the edit conflict by just pasting in their edit from the box for "your revision", but unless a third edit is missing that doesn't seem to be the case here. Protonk (talk) 21:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * My bad, thanks for taking a look. I was looking at the "cast" section, I see it now in the infobox, I thought I had added the foreign language wiki link to the "cast" section.Tstrobaugh (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Pendulum
Lol, what happened at The Pendulum, the Pit and Hope? Did we move the article exactly simultaneously? We both have the move in our edit histories. :p Smetanahue (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Czech film
I have many more to create. I have many Polish film and actors also to start. Thankyou for your expansions.Starzynka (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) I see many red links on actors on here which have articles on other wikipedias. I will try to start what I can. Actors in multiple film also connect articles together so is worth it. Few editors working on non American film I seeStarzynka (talk) 20:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Ivy Bean
The eyes are being rolled...... An encyclopedia entry about an old woman who used the Internet. LOL. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The laughable thing is that one of the !keepers thinks she is going to be notable in 100 years time and that this news story of the moment is going to continue. As far as I can see an old woman who used the Internet fpr the last two years of her life died. That's it!! So that means wikipedia automatically has a biography about the 102 years of her life in which she didn't use the Internet and lived a life as mundane and common as anybody with nothing notable to discuss for 102 years. At best this should make a small paragraph in the Twitter/Facebook article for being on record as the oldest user. What IO can't believe it how some people completely bend the guidelines to keep something they like. This will be forgotten by most in a few weeks time. Oh but this lady was kissed by Peter Andre, so she must be notable... The difference between newspaper fodder of the week and an encyclopedia diminishees, somewhat worryingly.. Dr. Blofeld      White cat 18:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS July 2010 Newsletter
The July 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Redlinked record labels, and epic movies (remix)
I found 2 you dont have on your list: Embryo Records, a vanity label created by/for Herbie Mann in the late 60's or early 70's. There is also an Embryo Records for disco music from the 2000's. the embryo label from herbie mann is a personal favorite of mine, but im not sure it counts as notable. i know your list hasnt been updated for a while, so i guess im just exploring and enjoying your user pages. you "voted" to keep the epic movie lists, and while i disagree, i checked here to see your editing background. You obviously know what you are doing, and i want to thank you for your extensive work here. If you think the articles can be salvaged, and that the term "epic" is eventually capable of being more clearly defined, i would seriously consider changing my vote. the issues reflected in this afd are big ones, and i want to understand them better. I am really not a deletionist, more of an eventualist, but i have trouble with terms that sound vague. maybe the Variety critic i mention has enough stature to allow us to quote him. he should have an article anyway, dont you think?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

BFI 75 Most Wanted
Thanks! I stumbled across the Most Wanted section of the BFI website at the weekend while researching a particular film, and it kept me enthralled for hours so I thought it was worth a share to point others in its direction. There's loads of absolutely fascinating stuff on there for film buffs, fantastic stills and promotional material etc. And if you want your laugh of the day, have a look at the screenshot for The First Men in the Moon - it's a hoot....seems like folk in 1919 imagined the moon to be peopled by golliwogs, fantastically un-PC! Draggleduck (talk) 19:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

recent comment on red wing article
I am aware of the limited information I presented in the initial article. However, on more than one occasion, such stubs have resulted in others fleshing them out into reasonable articles. I feel this is useful role for me and unless someone can convince me otherwise, I intend to continue this practice. Let me know your thoughts if you like.--Jrm2007 (talk) 06:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Challenge Records (1920s)
I have nominated Challenge Records (1920s), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Challenge Records (1920s). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Re Enter the Void
Thanks! Would be cool to bring it to GA status, though there's still a lot of work left before that can happen. Smetanahue (talk) 19:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Your edit summary
Please don't slander me in your edit summaries. At no point did I remove the reference for Whitworth Street. I've already had to ask you to tone down your provocative edit summaries.  Aiken   &#9835;   14:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I still you're still using provocative and childish edit summaries like "more failure!". Don't get me wrong, I'm sure you're just trying to piss me off, but it's not happening. Unlike you, it seems, I'm trying to get on with things without holding grudges. I've accepted the close of "no consensus" on the streets AFD, and tried to clean it up, and all you've done since then is attempt to revert my efforts, accuse me of disrupting Wikipedia, being a vandal, and being a "failure".  Aiken   &#9835;   17:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

G.W. Pabst template
Hi,

Tstrobaugh has been fooling around with this, but you appear to have concurred.

He's got films with well-known titles in English now changed to German. I don't give a shit; I read German. But what about everybody else?

He has given a famous film Westfront a Swedish title because the poster which illustrates the article happens to be in Swedish. If the poster had been in Mongolian, ...

In other words, he knoweth not what he doeth.

Varlaam (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

NOTOC
What is the use of putting like in this edit  done by you. --Sreejith K (talk) 12:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Category:Cinema of templates
Hi, I just wanted to query the use of these templates with you. No doubt they made good sense when you created them as they provided handy links to a country's "Cinema of" article, but I understand that we no longer do this per WP:EGG and now all they do is add a bit of plain text (which would be easier to just type out) and a category (which is probably better added manually). Is there any need to retain them? PC78 (talk) 20:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Le Voyage en douce
I started stubs on actors. Please add imdb etc. Thankyou.Starzynka (talk) 14:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Maybe a few need redirecting. I checked Helene Garcia and only one film so I redirect. Some may be expand. If you want some stubs start on actors or films please ask. I can start films/actors using a national cinema type website as a source.Starzynka (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Croatian films
Hi. I have created many Croatian films, see Category:Croatian films. Can you add cast/director to some?Starzynka (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! When working through if the article doesn't have plot/text on other wiki can you please remove the expand croatian tag? Most of them have not text to transfer, only actor/director listings. Unfortunately my summer holiday is soon over and back to work but I always try to edit when I can. In particular I want to transfer Polish and German films, so many. Titles can be moved to English later. Starzynka (talk) 08:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Le p'tit Parigot
Hi, thanks for working on this. I noticed you added cat Silent films. I had added that myself but removed it because I am not sure it is. Could you share where you found the info this is a silent? Thanks and regards, Superp (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Invitation for objective participation in discussion
As a trusted editor on WP, you're invited to look at the discussion at Articles for deletion/James Cagney, Jr. and comment. Thank you. Monkeyzpop (talk) 20:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Why is Gambler V not a film?
I saw you removed the category Category:Films directed by actors from Gambler V: Playing for Keeps. You say it is "not a film". Why is Gambler V not a film? Jason Quinn (talk) 11:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Friendly advice
Keep your edit summaries civil. MMN will find himself at ANI / RFC /WQA before too long the way he is carrying on at AfD (I'm hoping you know what I am referring to and won't need to post diffs). Mjroots (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Annie Cordy
thanks for the feedback, share the article creation bug -- simple trans from the french, better to tag frenchtrans than blpunref. you see the wiki english bias here, the equivalent, say Dolly Parton would not get the same treatment. Accotink2 talk 21:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Pearl Jam songs
Great minds think alike There are still plenty more song categories to be added or created if you're interested, but I think I've got the Pearl Jam songs pretty well locked down. Thanks for your note. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Vrijdag
I found something funny--I thought this looked like a reliable source from its appearance in Google News, but look at the bottom. Drmies (talk) 19:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It says "bron: wikipedia"--"bron" meaning "source." I'm saddened; we can't even trust the Belgians anymore. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

afd
I understand the temptation, & of course i agree with you about the article, but the attacks on another ed. at the Filair plane crash AfD are a little uncalled for, and not constructive. If anything, going after someone this way tends to produce sympathy for him. The case would have been much stronger without it. I suppose he'll give similar problems  again, but next time, please just stick to discussing the article, which you do very well.  DGG ( talk ) 02:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS August 2010 Newsletter
The August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator election
I started a discussion about this month's election that I'd like to get started in the next few days. Please comment there so the nomination period can be initiated quickly. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Unhelpful edit
Not sure if it's my place to say it, but I would like to point out that this edit to 2010 Copiap%C3%B3 mining accident was not very helpful. Please reconsider before adding refs from The Daily Mash to an encyclopedia. I enjoy their irreverence but wikipedia is not the place to be furthering the work of the Institute of Studies...! Bigger digger (talk) 15:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Nomination Period Open
The September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Hidden metadata removal
Good Question, Im actually not deleting the metadata, in most cases I am adding it. The only thing I have deleted was the unneeded comment and extra spaces. --Kumioko (talk) 19:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Its not problem its mostly a personal preferance thing. I only add it if someone makes an issue out of having the persondata on the article and deletes it. --Kumioko (talk) 19:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Imagination (film)
An editor has nominated Imagination (film), an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Imagination (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Flight for Freedom
Hi L, I just recently discovered this article which you had started. Take a look at the changes that were recently made. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill Sharkey's Last Game


The article Bill Sharkey's Last Game has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable per WP:NOTFILM. No sources claiming otherwise.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  01:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gentleman Joe (film)


The article Gentleman Joe (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable per WP:NOTFILM, no sources indicate otherwise.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  01:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Uhh...
As you can see, the above articles has been nominated for deletion, essentially because there are absolutely no reliable sources indicating their notability. The major problem here is that you have created an entire filmography of the main actor in these films, and as a result, there are hundreds of articles which possibly follow suit (I'm sure some are notable, obviously). Now, I sort of have a life off of Wikipedia, so I would like to have your help finding exactly which films fail WP:NOTFILM, if possible, seeing that you seem to be a bit of an enthusiast for this subject. Mind doing so? Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  01:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Bill Sharkey's Last Game for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Bill Sharkey's Last Game, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bill Sharkey's Last Game until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  03:27, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

comment
Wow.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Barney's Version
The film isn't released yet, so I thought it went under until the day it was released, where you switch it out for. Any number of things could happen between now and September 10. I think you are stepping into WP:CRYSTAL territory with this category. BOVINEBOY 2008 17:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ping. BOVINEBOY 2008 18:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Cinema of templates
Please justify you addition of generic cinema templates to articles. Navboxes only belong on article that link to them, none of which you have added do. BOVINEBOY 2008 19:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you please respond to this? BOVINEBOY 2008 20:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BOVINEBOY 2008 19:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Selket Talk 19:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

 Lugnuts  (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * So they have, you're not blocked any more. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Bulgarian films of the 1980s
Hi, I saw that you added a comment that Камионът was entered in a film festival. I was only listing those that actually won awards. There is a much longer list of films that were entered and did not win - this seems less noteworthy to me, but if you want to add such notes, it's OK with me. I don't know if there is any official policy on the subject. What do you think? --cbdorsett (talk) 07:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Infobox actor
Yobot could also immediately replace Infobox actor with Infobox person. The problem is the Category:Actors needing an image which is a tracking category automatically added with Infobox actor when no image is in the article. That's the reason we have to slow down the changes in the beginning. We have to find a solution what to do with this category, if we really need it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks for the notice, will mention it in the next newsletter. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Check out User:Erik/Draft, which documents Pricer1980 and related IP addresses' contributions. The category-based related changes help detect articles that were usually targeted. There's also a breakdown of the specifically targeted articles, though I need to identify which articles are the most recurring among IPs. Might help you sense when a sockpuppet pops up again. In addition, do you have any thoughts about ? I'm trying to jump the gun and assume guilt, but it's hard to tell what company-related edits are actually good or not. For example, there's a lot of Warner Bros. Family Entertainment links, but IMDb is unhelpful in listing related productions. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 18:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

"Cinema of" templates
Hello! A discussion about the use of {{Cinema of XXXX}} (like Cinema of France) in individual film articles has opened here. Your input would be greatly appreciated! BOVINEBOY 2008 08:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Excellent. Can't believe those films are still missing. I honestly don't know what all the fuss is about with the cinema templates. They're pretty harmless in my view and ease navigation. They only look an eye sore if there are well over 2 of them on top of each other. There should be an option for people who get anal about them to "hide all navigation templates" in your preferences. If you think this is a good idea would you support me in a proposal? I understand that some people hate them which is fair enough but there are others who find them useful so the option to hide them should be there I think. Dr.  Blofeld  11:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Please comment at here. Dr.  Blofeld  11:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Yuck have you seen 1979 in Israeli film etc...  Dr.  Blofeld  13:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Lugnuts! I haven't heard from you in a while. I posed a question at the discussion and was wondering if you could respond? BOVINEBOY 2008 15:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Cathay Pacific Flight 256
Hello, as you supported keeping the Cathay Pacific Flight 256 article by removing the proposed deletion request you are welcome to give your view at Articles for deletion/Cathay Pacific Flight 256. MilborneOne (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I bet you wouldn't of bothered with this if it was heading for a snow keep.  Lugnuts  (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Claude Chabrol
Per my edit summary, current editing of the above-captioned article cannot reasonably be described as being by "many editors . . . on the same day." If you think the categories included by inclusion of the template are applicable to the article, you can add them directly. But there's no reason to contradict the plain language (let alone the soft guideline) of the template instructions. Bongo  matic  06:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That's super.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Conviasa Flight 2350
Lugnuts, it's probably better for now to leave the notability tag there. The best way to demonstrate notability is to keep improving the article. Mjroots (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Gary Epper
Now that's an impressive filmography... Dr.  Blofeld  13:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Country parameter in Infobox film
Regarding what was recently discussed at Template talk:Infobox film, I've been doing some more work on the code that would allow the infobox to automatically format the country field and add the relevant category. It's more or less done, though there are a few exceptions and special cases in the general categorisation scheme that need some further consideration. I keep a copy of the infobox at User:PC78/Infobox film where this feature is now implemented, so feel free to try it out; the code that handles the formatting is at User:PC78/Infobox film/country. If you're still interested in this, we can discuss it further either here or at the template talk page. Regards. PC78 (talk) 01:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

OK, regarding certain film categories: Perhaps some of the above just requires cleanup. As for multiple countries, like the language parameter the infobox would only be able to handle a single country. To handle multiple countries would require multiple parameters, i.e. country1, country2, etc. Personally I don't think that would be a bad thing, but others may disagree. Another option would be to create a film country template which could format as many countries as you like. PC78 (talk) 00:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * As I understand it, should be for films of modern Germany only; older films should be categorised in, , ,  or  as appropriate.
 * Likewise, appears to be for films of modern Russia only, with older films categorised in either  or.
 * Soviet-era films of Armenia, Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuainia, Moldova and Ukraine gernerally have multiple categories. For example, Arsenal (film) is categorised in, and . This could easily be handled by the template, i.e. Soviet Ukraine (or similar) would display "Soviet Union (Ukraine)" and add all three categories.
 * Quebec isn't a country, but we have . In practise, Quebec films tend to be categorised in both and . As above, my thinking is that Quebec would display "Canada (Quebec)" and add both categories.
 * I'm not so sure about and  (is Trainspotting really a "Scottish film" or just a British film set in Scotland?); certainly I find the inclusion of film articles in  highly dubious. But if valid, perhaps handle as above.
 * Again, I'm not sure about Czechoslovak/Czech/Slovak films. Personally I think it would make sense to keep the three seperate, but there are 50 films categorised in both and.
 * The same duplication exists with Yugoslavian films and the former Yugoslav republics.

CCI
Thank you for your help with the ongoing contributor copyright investigation! I notice, though, that while you are removing the template, you are not noting your actions at the CCI subpages as per the directions for removal on the template. Please be sure to complete the process for those articles you've already cleared. If you aren't sure how, the procedure is at Contributor copyright investigations/Darius Dhlomo/How to help. Thanks! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I realize it's a pain that they aren't A-Z (if I could do it, I'd make them coincide) but you can find which page contains an article by following "what links here", whereupon it's not that difficult to find them. It's really important to log your findings. If you don't do it, somebody has to double check your work, because the master list (which is organized by size of contribution) won't show that the articles have been checked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Heads up
You forgot to sign here. — ξ xplicit  07:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

.And God Created Them
Hello Lugnuts, you created the article "And God Created Them" based on the movie "Y Dios los Cria". User:Quazgaa has made the correct observation here that the title translation is incorrect since the term "Cria" in Spanish means "Raised", while the term "Creo" means "created". I believe, that as the creator of the article, it would be only fair to give ypu the option of re-naming it to one of the following suggested titles: God Nurtures them or They are Raised by God. Take care and happy editing Tony the Marine (talk) 20:32, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul Markwitz for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Paul Markwitz, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paul Markwitz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  16:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks for the heads up. What was the reason, so I can detail it in the newsletter? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)