User talk:Lugnuts/Archive 24

A barnstar for you!
(barnstar moved to user page - thanks!)  Lugnuts  And the horse 17:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Dominican submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Fixing stub changes
Hi,

Thanks for spotting the stub-sorting error with ! I've been talking to Max, and we think we've worked out how to stop it doing the resorting on any future edits - we're just looking into fixing up the edits before restarting it (under supervision) Andrew Gray (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

VIAFbot
Just a quick note to say thanks for spotting the bugs in this - we've rewritten the code to be much simpler, looking for a specific place in the article to insert the template rather than its default setup of trying to be clever! It's been tested on some mockups and seems to be working okay, so we've tried it out on some of the live articles that caused problems and it worked correctly this time, leaving stub tags where they should be.

All the original edits have been reverted, and we'll run the corrections (under supervision!) tomorrow.

Thanks again, Andrew Gray (talk) 23:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Aviation films overcategorization
Hi, just fyi, that same IP editor (from New England, according to Geolocate) who pops up every year or so to add Category:Aviation films to articles already in Category:Documentary films about aviation is back. Myself and another editor have challenged him on this and asked him to stop, and for now at least, he has. You've engaged with him before so I wanted you to be aware, as well. See User talk:24.62.128.35. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Template removal
You shouldn't be removing templates until after the deletion process, it may yet be in my favour. All you're doing is being disruptive. I'm asking you to stop, or I'll raise it with AN as pointed and ownish behaviour. Thanks,  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 10:12, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't "son" me, please.. there's no "will" only "might". Don't presume to guess.. when the nominator of a deletion starts removing content in favour of the nomination, it's a COI. I also consider it damned impolite to be removing 180 contributions before the community has spoken first. No one gave you that authority. You're supposed to wait for deletion consensus. Don't quote AGF whilst offering me none..  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 10:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I never said I did, I'm saying the result of the deletion request authorises/approves the right to delete the templates. Semantics.. don't be funny, you know fine well what I meant.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 10:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Birth places
You welcome, Lugnuts. I'm always glad to help. Thank you for creating so many articles about Olympic athletes. Much appreciated. - Darwinek (talk) 13:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm MarcusBritish. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 13:52, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

And you're warned to stay off my talk page, from now on.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 09:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobby Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Sports-reference
I think it was meant to be used. --Kasper2006 (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * See here please. --Kasper2006 (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ralph Williams (athlete), Lugnuts!

Wikipedia editor Go Phightins! just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good start, but please help expand and add reliable sources."

To reply, leave a comment on Go Phightins!'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Talkback
Go Phightins! (talk) 20:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

3RR warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.


 * That was a 4RR in 24hr. Expect a report at AN3 shortly. If you're going to quote "consensus" learn to live by it.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 06:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mariken van Nieumeghen (1974 film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 07:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I understand that SR as ref and as EL can not go together, but ...
...based on your vast experience, consider it as "External link" can cover more details than "ref" for the individual results, especially if they, at least, can it be otherwise source. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 06:45, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: DEFAULTSORT
You really need to educate yourself better on how "DEFAULTSORT" works at Help:DEFAULTSORT, taking particular note of DEFAULTSORT; by adding a DEFAULTSORT that is identical to the PAGENAME you're adding worthless material to dozens of articles and benefiting no one. DEFAULTSORT should be used for things like reversing names to surname, firstname and excluding "The" from the front of titles, like Invaders, The. If you "already know this" (which you should after 6 years and 200,000+ "edits") then you've got to admit to having a compulsion to be (top) of every article you created, which is highly evident in your editing pattern, do note and I've counted 500+ clear examples, so it's a no-win situation.. at least try to edit with some level of British competence.. ever considered attempting to write some high-quality GA material film articles instead of going back over the same old stubs each day, trying to "better" people who have "out-edited" you by a byte? Must be so boring maintaining stubs all day, as it requires no determinable talent. Well, better let you get back to sentry duty.. I think an IP-editor just tweaked one of "your" pages.

Oh, and I'm not a vindictive man either, just a WP:SPADE owner, but that thing you said about Laramie/gun/knife/barefist fight.. naaaaah, I have a selective conscience, so I'd sooner shoot or stab a manc I dislike in the back than face him on equal terms. Mainly because I don't believe in "survival of the fittest", just "survival of the smartest" (which that episode of Red Dwarf proved). Such is life. And as for "apply for the death penalty", I asked the JobCenter for a job as "executioner" the day they reimpose the DP once, but they don't have a SOC code for it. Albert Pierrepoint would be a busy man these days, were he and the DP still around, and I'd gladly assist him. So don't think remarks like that have any impression on me, I'm not easily intimidated by bullies. You're right, there are 4m+ articles on Wiki to edit.. problem is, you habitually guard "your" 13,000+ creations and make it harder for the rest of us to comfortably enjoy trying to improve them; your attempts to vilify my creation of the John Wayne template, with spurious remarks about my motives, for example, was one such example of a non-collaborative attitude and exhibited territorial behaviour, psychologically speaking. If you don't consider that a problem, you might want to try re-evaluating your methods, because you can never reclaim lost or wasted time. I think that answers all your comments, so there's no further need for discussion. My demand that you remain off my talk page stands.. if you really need to reply, do it here, on your talk page.. all future postings on my page, from you, will be completely ignored and instantly removed,so don't waste your time or my bandwidth, and by stating this I will take any such posts as wilful ignorance of this request (see WP:NOBAN), and WP:IDHT. Perhaps with your recent outburst of discrimination against the Scots, generalisation and attempts to discomfort people make you feel "big" on the internet, but you will find that such keyboard warrior remarks fall more into the WP:TROLL category. As you say, "Happy editing", this semi-polite conversation is now considered resolved and I'm closed to all further discussion per WP:DGAF! Cya, Smeghead!  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 20:22, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Titles
Okay trouble, you deal with Silent film articles more than I.. do you think Harold Lloyd's feature films is a good title for that article? I don't think we generally use possessive titles.. normally we omit the  's or use an "of" wording.. so wouldn't Harold Lloyd feature films or List of Harold Lloyd feature films seem better? Either way, I'll leave it to you to move if you feel like it. Alternatively, it might even be better to merge it all into the Harold Lloyd filmography and #R given that they are both quite short pages, I don't see why someone has split them, but there might be a reason. There are only two possessive titles in Category:Filmographies that I can see, that Harold Lloyd page, and Richard Harris' filmography.. again I think the use of an apostrophised title is a bad idea and should be moved to fit in with the standard naming convention. Do whatever you think best in each case, I ain't fussed either way.. just cleaning up the sloppy markup did my job. Adios,  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 16:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Okay, go ahead, it's non-controversial.. don't forget to follow the WP:MERGE procedure, Creative Commons edit summaries are required.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 16:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Have merged it myself, copy-edited lead and headings as required. Refs/cats also transferred. If you want to take a look over it to see that all relevant data has been included, please do so. Size isn't an issue, as we thought, just under 18,000 bytes after editing. Though the earlier films might need converting from list to tables to allow for more content to be added, one day. For now, seems fine.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 06:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

The Loneliest Planet
Hey Lugnuts. Could you keep on eye on The Loneliest Planet? I am on the verge of breaking 3RR over some editor who has a self-proclaimed COI on her/his talk who continually removes the premiere date and changes the premiere year. BOVINEBOY 2008 20:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your helpful edits to the new article I've recently created, One Hundred Years of Evil. Much appreciated, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 08:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep me posted if you come across additional secondary sources (my research on that is still ongoing). &mdash; Cirt (talk) 08:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Now, you will see me one more time if you do good. You will see me two more times, if you do bad
Hey man. Could you check for me what the page numbers for the information you quoted me on the Lynch FLC are? I'd add the material but I can't read the book through Google or Amazon (and am a bit too broke to pick it up just yet). With a page range I could piece it together easy enough from what you've already given me so I'm grand in that regard. Thanks dude. GRAPPLE  X  18:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Hurricane Sandy
Could you please explain why you are removing sources and adding a citation needed tag to the Current storm information section. United States Man (talk) 18:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The cite is what you have been removing. WP:NOTNEWS does not apply here. If you remove it again you will be reported for vandalism, as is stated in the hidden note just above the disputed content. United States Man (talk) 18:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Style requires it. If you have a problem, you need to go to the project talk page and discuss it there. Until something is resolved it is required to remain on there. United States Man (talk) 19:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you agree to let this remain on there and stop arguing then I will remove your name. United States Man (talk) 19:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

CfD talkback
'''Hello, Lugnuts. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_October_30#Category:Portuguese_actresses.''' You can [ remove this notice] at any time. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Barnard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lichtenburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Good work all around! :-) -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

If there are two options ...
...why must to be you to decide which is the correct one? Here someone told you that it is not so and here someone told you that it is not a good thing rollbacked an user without a good reason. --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I do not doubt it. But do not you think it's better to ask to the project that primarily uses this tempalte (as I did here)? After all we are good guys is useless to fight. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Fix also Marion Jones and Carl Lewis
They also have with the flag. It's another question for the community. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:43, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

"Abortion"
I strongly advise you to strike your comment. It was really offensive. --Dweller (talk) 10:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Code (band)
— Northamerica1000(talk) 11:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Stub sorting
Recently, I've been working on WikiProject Stub Sorting, moving articles marked as to more specific stub categories so that people who know about a specific topic can focus on stubs about that topic. I noticed that you've tagged a lot of articles with a generic  , which makes more work for stub sorters. A (mostly) complete list of all available stub types can be found at WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types. A userscript which makes finding stub categories easier is available at User:MC10/stubtagtab.js. &mdash; Wolfgang42 (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2nd Moscow International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clear Skies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Foreign film posters
As someone who continues to edit on Foreign language films, I think you should look at this conversation. [Talk:The_Fifth_Element#Infobox_poster Your opinion would be helpful]. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:American Male actors
I am trying to see if you want to have Category:American actors and Category:American actresses as the end result of your motion, or if I have misunderstood what you have said.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 3rd Moscow International Film Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Boys (film), Bad Girl and Black Wings


 * Jerzy Marr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Galicia


 * Krystyna Ankwicz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Galicia


 * Stefan Hnydziński (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Przemysl


 * Wiktor Biegański (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Sambor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Cache
Hate to interupt you again, but your views on the talk page would help greatly. Even if you disagree with me! Just to get some balance. It's difficult to discuss things with Ring alone.Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Toronto is a blast! I hope you enjoy Amour. White Ribbon didn't do it for me like some of his previous films but if it lives up to other things like Cache or The Piano Teacher, I'm sold. Sadly, only one place where I live actually shows 35 mm prints as everyone else has gone digital. Hoping to see it how it's meant to be seen! Andrzejbanas (talk) 10:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

infancia clandestina the film
It is necessary to re edit and correct the page you created on this film, since it totally lacks real sources. PLEASE use actual valid information about the DICTATORSHIPS in Argentina, country that has send to justice, and still does, the criminals that took over power and killed innocent people.

Nomination of Douglas Z. Doty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Z. Doty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Douglas Z. Doty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. by Kevin12cd  Talk to me  This was posted at  23:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

When edit warring, please mind your language, Sir/Madam. (Re: Notorious Doper)
WRT: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Livestrong_Foundation&action=history

Please keep your tongue (fingers?) in check when going about a crusade. There is no need for foul language, or throwing the rule book at me. You can speak on my talk page, your talk page, or (best) the article's talk page, if you want to say something about the edits. I'm re-posting my reply to Denisarona which he/she ignored and now seems to have removed from their talk page:


 * ==Notorious Doper==
 * What more does LA have to do to become notorious? The characterisation was apt, well supported by a link to his main article, and widely reported in the media. It is not a POV any more, established and accepted by, among others, the USADA and the Union Cyclistes International. He *is* a doper, and he has certainly achieved notoriety. In fact, he may be the most notorious sportsperson in the US ever. Marion Jones has nothing on this. I'll reiterate my position.
 * Please state why you feel it is not so, else I should add the moniker again. Thanks. 117.197.48.16 (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you have nothing to say? Please reply. 117.197.48.16 (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

If you wish to discuss this in a constructive, non foul-mouthed way, I welcome you to the article's talk page. If not, please stay out of the way of other, more constructive editors. I'm willing to add external links to support my position. I've no desire to edit-war on this, so I'm letting your version stand until this is resolved. Thank you for your co-operation. 117.197.51.64 (talk) 08:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * That's awfully big of you!  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Er, what? Anyway, see the article talk page. Thanks!117.197.59.155 (talk) 09:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Polish actors
I thank you for creating the much needed stubs. - Darwinek (talk) 19:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Ref Advice
I saw that you spruced up my cite on "In the Wee Wee Hours...". What's the best syntax for URL refs? I'm still trying to figure that out. Probably A Bad Guy (talk) 20:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. though I'm still caught up on "accessdate".  I did some reading on the template and it says "the date the page was accessed".  Does that mean when I accessed it, or when it launched? Probably A Bad Guy (talk) 13:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Blackie Whiteford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blackie Whiteford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Blackie Whiteford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 5th Moscow International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shock Troops (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Removing stub status
See here if an article has infobox template (sometime photo), 4 or 5 sections (included biography and achievements), references, external links: absolutely not a stub, maybe expandable, but not a stub. You can put expand section before "Biography" section and bye bye. --Kasper2006 (talk) 12:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that you are the one that decide that I'm wrong. --Kasper2006 (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * For me is not enough, the other editor use AWB (automatic from class in the talk page), don't try to do the smart. ;) --Kasper2006 (talk) 13:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treasure of San Gennaro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Wolff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
You too Lugnuts, hope you are well!!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  15:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho
I keep noticing your work on the death anomalies project, and thought that this was a good time of year to say thanks 

 Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Happy Happy

 * Also best wishes for your 2013 and happy editing whenever possible :-) MarnetteD | Talk 16:48, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!
'''For all you do!! Have a wonderful HOLIDAY!!''' 

Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Season's tidings!
To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sandpit Generals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Nielsen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Boxing Day
Talk:Joseph, Prince de Caraman-Chimay moved as suggested. You're a good guy, have a good Boxing Day! In ictu oculi (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Endash allergy?
Hello Lugnuts.

What is the purpose of (repeatedly on Christian Schrøder) replacing an – with & ndash;? I think I've seen someplace here, though, typically enough, I can locate the place now, that the opposite of your actions is recommended.

You can reply here.

Regards

HandsomeFella (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello again.

Would you care to respond? I can see that you are active.

Regards

HandsomeFella (talk) 11:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi.

Could you please respond to the above?

Thank you

HandsomeFella (talk) 14:32, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Creating a page?
Requests for adminship/Lugnuts is a redlink; care to make it blue? Please respond at my talk or give me a talkback. Nyttend (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)