User talk:Luielle

Hello, I'm Helpsome. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 09:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 11:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

WP:COI
In this edit summary you claim to have no connection to the subject, but in this edit summary you claim an email correspondence with the same person as justification to remove content. Do you or do you not have a connection with Mikael Colville-Andersen? Helpsome (talk) 12:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Please answer the above question. Helpsome (talk) 14:15, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

As I wrote, I emailed the company. Quite simple really. No connection, only professional interest. You should probably email them yourself before randomly undoing changes based on personal perception. www.copenhagenize.eu. Someone named Julie Kierkegaard responded.


 * All of your edits were to promote Mikael Colville-Andersen and when some were reverted you made what appeared to be vindictive edits removing photos and links. The photos are licensed (which you can see here and here) so if the company really wants them removed, then contacting Wikipedia is the appropriate action. Helpsome (talk) 15:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Please remember to include "In my personal opinion, it would appear that you were perhaps..." before you write "trying to promote.... " etc, because I am quite sure that we have never met and your assumption is, apart from being false, rather rude and arrogant. It is clear that this particular subject matter - urbanism/urban planning - is not in your sphere of interest, so perhaps you should stick to subjects of which you actually have knowledge. In your one-man domination show of the page in question, you "allow" external links to an online talk to one of the other individuals listed under Advocates, but undo the addition of a link to a TED talk by another. TED talks are non profit, by the way.

In addition, on the actual source of the graphic design poster it asks us to credit Copenhagenize Design Co. when using it on other sites. Those of us who work in creative fields take proper crediting of creative works seriously. It's difficult to take you seriously when you consistently contradict yourself in such an unprofessional manner. Luielle (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)


 * As I noted, credit information for the photos is in those links. We don't credit photos within the articles. Clicking on the photos takes the reader to all the information they might need. You might take your own advice: in chastising me for making assumptions you make quite a few yourself. Helpsome (talk) 15:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC)