User talk:Luigi Perutti

June 2016
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Union of South American Nations, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. clpo13(talk) 17:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Link spam

 * Could you read over WP:CITESPAM before it's all removed.--Moxy (talk) 05:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing as your account is only being used to add citations to papers written by Luis Schenoni. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:    Number   5  7  10:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

I've fixed and merged your requests into one, only one request is needed. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

If you make another unblock request, simply copy the unblock template from the page you are reading and paste it into the edit window; don't copy it from the edit window as this adds unnecessary wikicode. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes the sources maybe credible that all came from one site.....but the rate that these were being added does not look like anyone could have time to read the articles in question and evaluate the sources. Looks just like spam.--Moxy (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

They were being added at that rate because the academic article is about each and every coup and democratic transition in Latin America since 1945. It was not difficult to google each coup/transition and add the link. Once again, this is the latest academic appraisal of these coups/tranistions, in a major academic journal, so I googled each coup/transition analyzed and added the link to the most reliable source out there. Actually, my behavior enhances most of those entries. If you would please take a moment to look at those entries you will realize that they need a lot of work and what I did was a first step in that direction. Please take the time to evaluate this more thoroughly instead of looking at rates only. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luigi Perutti (talk • contribs)

I might add I understand there is a consideration about the rate at which these post come out and I understand that I cannot add links without introducing relevant text (because it looks like spamming). I will change my behavior in that regard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luigi Perutti (talk • contribs)


 * I've unformatted your posts subsequent to your first unblock request; if you have additional comment, you don't need the "unblock" coding. 331dot (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)