User talk:Luis F. Chaluisan

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Luis F. Chaluisan


A tag has been placed on User:Luis F. Chaluisan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.radioflag.com/profile/ElExtreme#. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Luis F. Chaluisan (talk) 16:08, 14 December 2014 (UTC) The information was created/submitted/written by myself and utilized since 2007 on social media sites including Reverbnation, Myspace, Facebook, google+ to inform the general public. The radioflag bio is in the same genre utilized when I was a staff announcer at WBGU FM in Bowling Green Ohio.


 * An administrator has reviewed it and determined that it is also in contravention of user page guidelines. Specifically, WP:NOTWEBOST.  Aslo, see below, about your use of multiple accounts on Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Sock puppetry
It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)