User talk:Luis ciudad vaca

Nomination of Edgar C. Otálvora for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edgar C. Otálvora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edgar C. Otálvora until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —AssassiN's Creed (talk) 21:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the premature deletion announcement for Edgar C. Otálvora
Sorry for the deletion announcement for your recent new article. A new editor doesn't know the rules for nomination. Normally your article would not be a candidate at the point. The article does have a problem in that there are no reliable references. An article about a living person must have references or it will eventually be deleted. Reliable references include newspaper, magazine, news sites such as CNN or BBC. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask them on my talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 23:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Edgar C. Otálvora
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Edgar C. Otálvora. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

== Edgar C. Otálvora is a traslate of es:Edgar C. Otálvora Thanks. The references is coming. Luis ciudad vaca (talk) 03:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
—AssassiN's Creed (talk) 02:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for adding references
The article looks much better with the references. I wish google translate was better so I can understand some of them better. My only comment is the books/article section is somewhat messy and could be trimmed. Could you leave only his books and most important articles and cut the rest. When you are done, give me a message on my talk page and I can clean up the syntax (look) of the section. Thank you for writing the article. I learned alot by reading about him. Bgwhite (talk) 06:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

People from Venezuela
Hi, could you please not add Category:People from Venezuela to any more articles ? The correct category is Category:Venezuelan people but in all of the cases I have lookmed at, the people already belong to a subcategory of Venezuelan people such as Category:People from Caracas etc. If they are in a subcategory of Venezuelan people they don't need to also be in a parent category, see Categorization. Thanks.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 10:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC) Of course. I agree 201.208.135.243 (talk) 17:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Unblock
{{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Luis ciudad vaca (talk) 04:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)}

Ways to improve Francisco Hernáiz
Hello, Luis ciudad vaca,

Thanks for creating Francisco Hernáiz! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SkimmerMotion


A tag has been placed on SkimmerMotion, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --- Possibly (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I see you have created some good articles, but SkimmerMotion is very clearly company.product advertising.--- Possibly (talk) 01:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Juan Astorga Junquera for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juan Astorga Junquera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Juan Astorga Junquera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Rkieferbaum (talk) 01:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)