User talk:Luisrios94

Hi; not sure what you were doing with Texas. For one thing, you can't just invent an entry for a template, you can only use the ones listed in template:US state. Also, the information you put in didn't match the web page you used as reference. Looie496 (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Postoak (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Postoak (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Revolving Bugbear 03:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Population data
Hi, please don't change population data in Wikipedia article without providing your source. Thanks —Jeremy (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Please stop. If you continue to change population data without citing reliable sources you will be blocked from editing. —Jeremy (talk) 01:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —Jeremy (talk) 01:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

If you change in population data in articles you must cite the agency that has produced the new population data. If you do not, the changes will always be reverted. Please read Verifiability and Citing sources for more information. —Jeremy (talk) 00:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Images
Hello. I guess you've noticed that external URLs don't work here for images, so you uploaded Image:T9ejd4.jpg. Alas, that image looks like a professional photo, which means WP can probably only use it under a "fair use" claim. The existing image in the article is "free" - licensed under a compatible Creative Commons license, and WP prefers "free" images to "fair use" images. If the image is essential to the topic, a fair use claim may be justifiable, but the free image would (probably) still remain in the article. Your uploaded image may be removed in a couple days if the source of the image and valid "fair use" claim are not provided. If you can provide the source of the image and need more help understanding fair use on Wikipedia, let me know. Gimmetrow 22:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:T9ejd4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:T9ejd4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nuevosricos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nuevosricos.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Morenooso (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Mujeres Asesinas. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you.--Morenooso (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 04:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Poster-telenovela-teresa.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Poster-telenovela-teresa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:33, 4 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:33, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Teresa(Telenovela)
A tag has been placed on Teresa(Telenovela) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shlok 14:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachinvenga (talk • contribs)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)