User talk:LuizaMelSantos

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, LuizaMelSantos. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Haptoglobin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

On Polycystic ovary syndrome, the paper you are copying from (this one) is not compatibly licensed. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License is not a compatible license. Please don't add it any more. To do so is a violation of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 20:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Polycystic ovary syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. ''There is a concept called cite spamming where one reference is spammed to multiple sections. Please take a look at Wikipedia's guideline of spam. Thank you.'' — B. L. I. R. 16:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello
 * Thank you for your message
 * I am not the author of any of the added references. There is no conflict of interest. I just made necessary corrections and added references that I've been studying lately.
 * Is the problem repeating the same reference? If that's the problem, I'll be more aware of it. I thank you for the guidance. LuizaMelSantos (talk) 16:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm starting in this activity but I'm really dedicating myself to it. LuizaMelSantos (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If there is no conflict of interest, why are nearly all your references to papers written by the same author? MrOllie (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear MrOllie,
 * I have included references from various authors from different research groups and countries.
 * Previously, I had used the same reference many times because it is a review that is quite comprehensive, but since you explained to me that I shouldn't do that, I reduced the mention to this specific reference.
 * I've been studying about inflammatory markers in PCOS, diabetes, and obesity; it is natural that I read papers from the same research groups because they publish my topics of interest. I can't write about topics I haven't studied.
 * I am offended by your distrust, as I am dedicated to contributing to wikipedia. LuizaMelSantos (talk) 17:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking about the same reference, I am talking about how all of the different references have an overlap in authorship. Why is that? You should know that you aren't the first account to engage in this sort of behavior. You said above that you aren't an author, but are you associated with these authors in some fashion? COI as defined on Wikipedia is a fairly broad concept. MrOllie (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * "this sort of behavior"?!?! What kind of behavior are you referring to? Please don't be rude because I've been talking to you cordially. I have dedicated my time to a project (wikipedia) that I believed in. I have mainly tried to correct conceptual errors and add useful information.
 * It is not true that ALL references have overlapping authorship. And I don't know the authors personally. I just studied their papers. LuizaMelSantos (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yours is not the only account who has appeared on Wikipedia with the goal of spreading citations to this particular author. MrOllie (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)