User talk:Luka1184

Deltora Quest (serie)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Deltora Quest (serie), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Deltora Quest 1. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history. This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

No
No, cause its two different things. The book series contains >3< different series which centers around the same characters and story and world, and there has always been both articles, and please let it be so. Its not a big deal to delete it :)

Proposed deletion of STARS (short film)


The article STARS (short film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Is not notable under WP:NF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

No, no, no
This is true information about a new short film, that is great and professionaly made! And therefore please let last there, cause' its valuable and worthy information :)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spider-Man 2, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-5- (talk) 09:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

The article Double Life (book) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which is unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamentally rewrite). Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

June 2011
Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia, as you did at The Angry Video Game Nerd. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted or removed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. C T J F 8 3  08:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Angry Video Game Nerd (film)


A tag has been placed on The Angry Video Game Nerd (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Dream out loud (talk) 01:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Luka1184, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Betty Logan (talk) 08:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Transformers (film series)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 08:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Wizard of Rondo cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:The Wizard of Rondo cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Teaser poster for Angry Video Game Nerd, The Movie.jpeg)
Thanks for uploading File:Teaser poster for Angry Video Game Nerd, The Movie.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely sure I uploaded that picture. I thought someone else had done that... maybe I forgot that I did. Though, you are wrong. It is a completely free teaser poster, made for the movie, posted for free for the public to see. The new official poster that was recently unveiled, however, is not free. It can be bought. Anyway, I will not fix the information that you have mentioned. Luka1184

EDIT: Wait a moment, what are we talking about here? AVGN_Official_Poster.jpg or Teaser_poster_for_Angry_Video_Game_Nerd%2C_The_Movie.jpeg? Because the latter I have not uploaded at all. It seems like it is the latter you're asking me about, so if it is, again, I have not uploaded it, and you realy should contact the actual uplaoder of that picture, that is if it that picture you're talking about :) (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The teaser poster for the Angry Video Game Nerd Movie, as posted by Cinemassacre itself. The poster has been designed and painted by Pavel Lagutin.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The teaser poster for the Angry Video Game Nerd Movie, as posted by Cinemassacre itself. The poster has been designed and painted by Pavel Lagutin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Blurred   Lines  17:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Three Doors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Golden Door (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

TB
C T F 8 3 ! 11:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

July 2014
Please stop your disruptive behavior. Your behavior is harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to Angry Video Game Nerd: The Movie, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. '' Please stop your disruptive editing. Furthermore, if you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. '' https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Angry_Video_Game_Nerd:_The_Movie&diff=618440397&oldid=618409803 — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 23:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * This was also posted to the Talk page of the IP address that you keep using, as proven by the fact that you stated under this account that the IP edits were made by you, and as you've made consecutively identical double edits under each identity.
 * Hello there. Aparently stating a simple opinion makes one block-worthy, eh? Fine. --Luka1184 (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Three Doors


The article The Three Doors has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable work of fiction

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic  L ondon 19:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, that had an excellent result, as Coolabahapple has now added independent citations with evidence of notability.
 * Please would you take care to do that yourself on new pages in future? – Fayenatic  L ondon 15:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Deltora Book Of Monsters.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Deltora Book Of Monsters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dashkin (video game) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dashkin (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dashkin (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * There are interviews coming out soon - at least one - which would add more sources, and Phillips and Sexton are also going to GDC soon. Which would probably mean more sources, second ones separate from their personal websites too. Please hold out and let me add those and we'll see if it could possibly stay on here. --Luka1184 (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Devil's Apprentice


A tag has been placed on The Devil's Apprentice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 10:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. I read your contested deletion and my deletion comment, in reply, said "read WP:YFA WP:RS WP:Notability (books). Reviews and social media are not proper sources." have you followed those links? further comments follow:
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines for books. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the author or publisher, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the author or publisher claims. Most of your text was unreferenced or had non-sources like social media.
 * Your "Themes and inspirations" appears to be an unsourced personal essay or WP:OR. As with the reviews, what people think about the book isn't relevant as a notability criterion
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Yours was almost entirely an outlet for the author's opinions and social media postings about his own book, plus some reviews, not a proper encyclopaedia article.
 * A large part of the text has no wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. You should be aware that copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial, andext is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the author or a related company, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:     . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

I don't know whether this book meets our notability criteria, but you can't just write what you like without regard to our rules. See To Kill a Mockingbird to see a good example of a book article. You don't have to write to that standard or length, but it may guide you with structure and sourcing.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:22, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If social media links are never thought to be reliable sources, why are they constantly used without deletion when we're talking about authors and actors of far greater notability? What makes their notability give their article free passes for social media link sources? Any celebrity can write something that's not factually correct on their social media platforms. Or do Wikipedia still strive to follow up these with newspaper articles, and if possible, use articles about or listing said social media posts? If yes, what makes these kind of articles different? They can be have misinformation too. Am I supposed to follow up said article with another article about the same thing? --Luka1184 (talk) 21:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Nobel Team (Halo)
Hello! I've just created a new draft for the Noble Team. Any help would be greatly appreciated! The Optimistic One (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hi Luka1184! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Rowan of Rin (series) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 07:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I was tired and so didn't notice. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, Dan. Good to have an Aussie looking after the Roddaverse on here by the way! --Luka1184 (talk) 09:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! That’s the nicest response I’ve had so far. :) Yeah it’s easily done. 🇦🇺 Cheers, AussieWikiDan (talk) 11:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Adam Phillips (animator) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Phillips (animator), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Adam Phillips (animator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)