User talk:LukasHnh

Feedback on your article
Hello LukasHnh, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

You basically wrote a book summary, that is something different than an article about a book on Wikipedia. So if an article is written about a book, it should not be a book summary. An article about a book is about how the book has a place in the world, where it is situated in the world, etc. Only a small part is about the contents of the book itself, summarised, the rest is about the era, circumstances, usage, etc of the book in society.


 * Intro sentence: okay, but I think that mentioning the shortened version is something that can be in the second sentence, not the first.
 * Links: missing! In Wikipedia articles we link keywords to other articles in the same Wikipedia. For example these can use a link: Ottoman Empire, Austen Henry Layard, etc.
 * Headers: Headings are needed to give structure to an article, but also to increase the readability of an article. In you article I would like to see the headers Context, Contents, Reception and References, but also others are welcome if relevant.
 * References: missing!! Every paragraph and every two/three sentences should have a reference. You can use a reference more than once. Without references an article can't be published.
 * Context/timeframe: missing! In this section I expect to read about what has led to the existence of the book and the timeframe in what the book was written.
 * How was the book received: missing! In this section I expect to read about how the book was received, what people thought of it, how it was used, what influence it had and how it influenced they way people thought, how the perspective of the book is different from modern views, etc.

If you need another review, let me know! Romaine (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)