User talk:Luke.O'Connor

This is just a test of me talking to myself....

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Red King (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

DIAS and the McCarthy report
You can't simply delete a text becuase you don't like what it says (see policy WP:I just don't like it). However you can certainly delete a text if it is not supported by citation, or it does not faithfully summarise the citation. The text cannot draw its own conclusion (as that would offend against WP:Original research or WP:Synthesis or both.

But the popular press has drwan inferences that the DIAS in in doubt, so we can't simply ignore it and say nothing, as that would be equally biased. Therefore the obvious thing to do is go back to the primary source [which we always prefer, and it always takes precedence over tabloid news] and report faithfully what it has to say on the subject, citing heavily - see WP:Citing sources. I would be content for you to do the work. --Red King (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * My intention was to assist you by pointing out the relevant policies that can assist (or hinder) you in writing a truthful summary of the report insofar as it affects the DIAS. I hope you find them useful. Best wishes with the rewrite.
 * I withdraw the reference to the popular press: I realise now that I inferred it from the words of the earlier editor wrote. I am hoist on my own petard of failing to rely on primary sources. --Red King (talk) 23:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)