User talk:Luke0613

Welcome!

Hello, Luke0613, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * You keep saying "The book chronicles Jewish domination of the Atlantic slave trade", thereby stating that Jews dominated the slave trade, as if that were a fact. Do that again and I will block your account indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 02:09, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

You're a weasel. You've decided the truth of a very biased previous edits and prevented me from correcting it. It's absurd that out of the box the book is knocked when it should be presented neutrally for its assertions. The word 'allegations' is classic poisoning the well. Austins comments were cherry picked distortions. The AHA commentary was a baseless political response. The ADL response simply is not scholarly and is pure bias. I don't care you blocked me. I'll just use it as a basis for petitions of why Wikipedia is intellectually deficient and biased.