User talk:LukeNE

Welcome
Hello LukeNE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:


 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Where to ask a question, try the Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! Mattinbgn\talk 01:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :-) LukeNE (talk) 18:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Mt Gambier
Great work on the article. Keep it up! Michellecrisp (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Salisbury Highway
Hi. I don't have time to fix it at the moment, but your recent changes to Salisbury Highway (and also, that which was there before) are not consistent with 2008 UBD. Do you have a different source that presumably conflicts with 2008 UBD? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I went for a drive today. National A13 stops at Pt Wakefield Rd. It seems there are some errors in 2008 UBD! As I asked, "Do you have a different source" we can quote that is more reliable than UBD? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi Pdf, considering I live in the Adelaide area and drive the length of Salisbury Highway regularly my sources for what I have previous put on this page come from local road signage, a number of street directory publications, maps etc. If you have more up to date information then by all means add them to the article. However from what you have stated in the above discussion im not sure I understand what your problem actually is, as edits you have made have simply exagerated what myself and others previous had on there. I already know National A13 is only listed between Port Wakefield Road and the Port River Expressway, this is because it is in a number of street directory publications as well as on road signage.LukeNE (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed noticing your reply. I thought I was being pretty clear. viz: I looked in the "new" UBD 2008; it says National A13 includes all of Salisbury Highway & John Rice Ave; the UBD 2008 is wrong; Can you supply a citation for a more accurate source? Regarding your comments: "a number of street directory publications, maps etc." - Good. Can we have some citations please? "If you have more up to date information then by all means add them to the article." - That's the point of this "conversation". Yes, I have a more up to date source (UBD 2008), but it contains errors. Yes, I did add the (wrong) information, but as you pointed out, it is wrong, and I have corrected it / restored it to your correct statements / etc. I really don't see any point in adding a citation for UBD 2008 - it supplies incorrect information! "im not sure I understand what your problem actually is" - I suppose I have two problems: 1) UBD 2008 contains errors. 2) The article is a bit light on specific citations to accurate information. "as edits you have made have simply exagerated what myself and others previous had on there." - Well, I would prefer the word "clarify" rather than "exagerate", but essentially, I agree with what you're saying. "this is because it is in a number of street directory publications" - Probably, but which ones? i.e. Could we have some citations please? By-the-way: It's probably worth mentioning somewhere that UBD 2008 is wrong, just so other poor trusting souls don't have to go through the same "voyage of discovery" that I went through! However, I'm not sure where that should be mentioned. Do you have any suggestions? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 22:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:John bannon.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:John bannon.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 16:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Australian Alphanumeric State Route A21.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Australian Alphanumeric State Route A21.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 17:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I have added the A21 logo to "Template:Road infrastructure in Adelaide" Pdfpdf (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmmm. Another user has created A21.png (along with .png for A11, A14 and A20).
 * Once again, A21.gif is orphaned. Pdfpdf (talk) 10:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Australian Alphanumeric State Route Ann.xxx
Hi again, I see you created Image:Australian Alphanumeric State Route A21.gif. If you have a look at Template talk:Road infrastructure in Adelaide, you'll see that the template could also make use of an A11, A14 and A20. I'd like to create them myself, but never having done so before, I don't really know where to start. Any suggestions? Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Overtaken by events. (See Template talk:Road infrastructure in Adelaide) Pdfpdf (talk) 10:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Railsa
Template:Railsa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Australian Alphanumeric State Route B84.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Australian Alphanumeric State Route B84.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Australian Alphanumeric State Route A18.PNG


The file File:Australian Alphanumeric State Route A18.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Australian prime ministers by political affiliation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Australian prime ministers by political affiliation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Australian prime ministers by political affiliation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. As part of this I have nominated List of prime ministers of Australia by time in office. Vladimir.copic (talk) 04:18, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of prime ministers of Australia by time in office for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of prime ministers of Australia by time in office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of prime ministers of Australia by time in office until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JML1148 (Talk &#124; Contribs) 01:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)