User talk:Luke Crute

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Bristol Airport, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ''"I work there" is original research. Wikipedia is based on verifiability not truth. You cannot simply edit articles in a haphazard manner based on your personal knowledge. You must provide proper reliable third party sources for changes that you make. '' Bob Re-born (talk) 15:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bristol Airport, you may be blocked from editing. ''"I saw it on the reservation system, but it is not yet public" is exactly what original research is. A fact has to be verifiable by other people using public sources. '' Bob Re-born (talk) 15:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Take a look at WP:CIRCULAR - wikipedia cannot reference itself. Plus you should put references into the article, not edit summaries. --Bob Re-born (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)