User talk:Luke Payn

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Keely Mills has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/onioneers (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:52, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Keely Mills
Hi Luke,

I removed the proposed deletion because of your note at the top of the article, and tried to clean it up a little. However, I'm still not sure if she's notable enough for an article. If you can show in the article that she meets these or these criteria, it would help. It would help if she's been published. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the number one thing that would show notability is significant coverage in multiple sources, i.e. something other than peterboroughtoday.co.uk. If there are articles that are about Keely herself, or at least have a reasonable fraction of the article about her, then they would count towards "significant coverage" in the notability guidelines. This is a start but more is needed. If it's an article about an event with just one sentence like "Peterborough poet laureate Keely Mills wrote a poem for the event" (like this), then that wouldn't really help.


 * I have to admit, unless there are some good sources that aren't on the internet, it doesn't seem like Keely is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. That's the conclusion other editors are coming to on the deletion discussion page, and they've given their reasoning.


 * It might be worth adding a bit about the Peterborough poet laureate to the section on the arts in the Peterborough article though. If the Keely Mills article does get deleted, and you want to use the text for something else, like putting part of it in the Peterborough article, or recreating the article if Keely becomes more well known, I've put a copy here. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 08:42, 1 October 2009 (UTC)